Apologies, my lazy reading and too much of joey quoting that fool tom bowers for years. I think someone who has been as ideology consistent as Corbyn has might appear as an oppositionist, probably the price of having principles.I did not say he was an opportunist, I said oppositionist. Which means he has no plans for anything, or desire to actually be in power where you can make a real difference to people's lives. Labour should be a broad church, but people at the top have to be folk serious about the issues and willing to fight the battles that need to be won if you're going to win elections. Corbyn refused to even try. Quite simply he is not a serious political figure and never should have been party leader.
He's about to lose his seat which only tells you he isn't as loved by his constituents as people want to believe. 40 years of service and yet he can't win once Labour remove the whip? That says a lot tbh.
On the second point, I don't think that speaks to a lack of popularity from his constituents. I'll be voting for Kim Johnson in my own constituency though I much prefer the green candidate having met him a few times and listened to his opinions on local issues that are important. I'll be doing so because I'm voting against the worst rather than for the best, I would imagine there is lots of similar motivation in Corbyns constituency where he remains popular, as by all accounts he was an accessible and hard working MP.

