Tottenham Hotspur

Dyche would give them a fighting chance of staying up, but it’d be incredibly difficult to implement his nine men behind the ball footy and lump it up to the grock brand of footy with nine games to go.

Plus he’d want at least what’s left of this season and next season as a contract.

Those players would dispose of Dyche even quicker than the Forest players did, imagine Xavi Simons being shown videos of Doucoure and told he isn’t good enough to do anything other than block off passing lanes 30 yards inside his own half.
 
Those players would dispose of Dyche even quicker than the Forest players did, imagine Xavi Simons being shown videos of Doucoure and told he isn’t good enough to do anything other than block off passing lanes 30 yards inside his own half.
You think the nuclear threat is bad now?

Just wait until Dyche, Stoney and Woany discover the stadiums cheese room.
 
Imagining them binning Tudor today and bringing in Dyche, then seeing him take their superstars on a training camp to Grimsby with a double Gaffer's Day thrown into the mix.

Honestly at this point I genuinely would no longer be surprised if they went down the proven firefighter route, a la Allardyce or Dyche.

I think they should have gone with somebody who has a Spurs connection — maybe even Mason tbh. The appointment of Tudor is absolutely baffling.

Is it too late for those fellers though?

9 games left. 27 points available. Both managers average 1 point per game. So gets them 38 points....so maybe.

Issue is, Forest and West Ham are stronger teams battling them compared to teams in previous years so...38 points may not be enough.
 
Is it too late for those fellers though?

9 games left. 27 points available. Both managers average 1 point per game. So gets them 38 points....so maybe.

Issue is, Forest and West Ham are stronger teams battling them compared to teams in previous years so...38 points may not be enough.

Spurs have managed just 12 points from 19 games they tell me

In that form they are in real real trouble
 
Remember they were part of the super league?

They're a 'big club' only in the sense they have a massive stadium and they win a cup every 20 years or so.

That's about it.

IMO any club that failed to win their national title for at least 20 years regardless of their history or size of support should never be called a big club.

That was my argument with Liverpool before they claimed the title last season (after the null and void Covid title, that is). Over 30 years without the title meant you weren't a big club anymore. Spurs have gone 64 years.
 
The players have them in this, but they’ll go down if they keep Tudor. They had Frank and would have been safe with him, but hired this fool who will get them relegated.
They never took to Frank , felt he was beneath them. If the board had stuck with Frank and made it clear to prima donna players that he was going nowhere i doubt they would be in this mess
 
I imagine they will need to rest players for the Champions League game :lol:
Suppose Van de Ven can play given he is suspended domestically.
 
They're a 'big club' only in the sense they have a massive stadium and they win a cup every 20 years or so.

That's about it.

IMO any club that failed to win their national title for at least 20 years regardless of their history or size of support should never be called a big club.

That was my argument with Liverpool before they claimed the title last season (after the null and void Covid title, that is). Over 30 years without the title meant you weren't a big club anymore. Spurs have gone 64 years.

Confusing big with recently successful. By your reckoning the only ones that can use the term are them lot, City, Chelsea, Leicester and Utd.

Of course with enough time, dwindling fan base, slipping down the leagues a big club can fall out of being able to call themselves that and become more a 'Historic' club. Out of 92 league teams Spurs are right near the top, just like Villa and us, not recently successful but big clubs.
 
Confusing big with recently successful. By your reckoning the only ones that can use the term are them lot, City, Chelsea, Leicester and Utd.

Of course with enough time, dwindling fan base, slipping down the leagues a big club can fall out of being able to call themselves that and become more a 'Historic' club. Out of 92 league teams Spurs are right near the top, just like Villa and us, not recently successful but big clubs.


I'd concede now that Liverpool have to be called a big club again. They won the covid cup which is roughy 0.5 PL title + a title last season.

After an absence of 30 dd years Liverpool are back again in the fold of big clubs.

Spurs: a laughable addition to that category...always were and always no doubt will be.

We have more ceiling to become a big club again than Spurs. It's in our DNA to win titles - much more than Spurs, Villa, Newcastle etc.

City and Chelsea point the way forward for us. We need another new investor after TFG sling their hooks. A sovereign wealth fund of some sort.
 
Remember they were part of the super league?
I will never forget.

I never minded spurs previously, and felt like they were the model we should follow for a while there. Turns out it was just a golden generation of players they had.

Absent an apology, I will never forgive rhem...any of them.

They were effectively trying to permanently relegate us by setting us in a second tier with no path up.
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top