Top of the Flops (part two)

Status
Not open for further replies.
We could have signed Salah for 10m less eh Steve.

Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
 
Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
You seem to know everything that’s been posted on rawk. Have you got anything to confess?
 

Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
Salah is 10x the player though
 
to be fair, salah was a bit of a gamble given the time he had at Chelsea whereas gylfi is proven in this league ( starting to show glimpses last few weeks as well )

salah is just boss though isn't he, another case of Chelsea not giving players a propa go
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top