Top of the Flops (part two)

Status
Not open for further replies.

We could have signed Salah for 10m less eh Steve.

Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
 
Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
You seem to know everything that’s been posted on rawk. Have you got anything to confess?
 

Sigurdsson was £40m rising to £45m

Salah was 42m Euros rising to 50m Euros.... about £37m rising to about £44m.

So they're likely to cost the same in transfer fees, the myth that Salah was £10m less is widely propagated on, coincidentally, RAWK. Fancy that,eh?

The Ox was about £10m less though.
Salah is 10x the player though
 
to be fair, salah was a bit of a gamble given the time he had at Chelsea whereas gylfi is proven in this league ( starting to show glimpses last few weeks as well )

salah is just boss though isn't he, another case of Chelsea not giving players a propa go
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top