s for
Well, you might well have other world-class players then - but then so will other countries. The time to capitalise on your current lead over the likes of Italy and Germany was 2020(1) and the last World Cup. 2018 was a bit early - and the soft draw opened up a chance that probably wasn't really there. But it was most certainly there after a minute of the Euro 2020 final. And it was there again with 15 minutes remaining of the World Cup quarter-final. But those chances were spurned. The chance is there again in 2024 - but this time it comes with the baggage of failure. The draw will go a long way to determining how big a chance this will be.
As to England having "midfielders who can play football" - it's been a time-honoured problem for England. England has always produced one or two superb midfield players - Charlton, Brooking, Wilkins, Robson, Hoddle, Gascoigne, Scholes - but has, more often than not - distrusted those players. And the supporting cast has never been as consistently technical as those on the continent. Only Charlton and Robson were ever made the main man in the England set up. Quality ball-players like Wilkins and Hoddle were always looked on with suspicion. Scholes was shunted out of his best position to make room for inferior but more action-oriented players like Lampard and Gerrard. Even the great new hope, Bellingham, is more about action that brainy finesse.
Anyway, this is a good England side - and a real contender next summer. In my book, only France are clearly better. England are among a group of sides who could win the competition if the French don't.