So to confuse to black men who have the same last name is disgraceful. It’s lazy casual racism and seems it’s okay just to plast a picture of any black man with the same name in an article about rape is either incompetent in the extreme or one of those ‘they all look the same’ type of behaviour which is racism.
Do your job properly or quit and go home.
To be fair, the media screws up this sort of stuff all the time these days. Editing is not what it used to be, at all. Content migrating to the internet has done to the media much what patching via the Internet did to software development - content with errors/bugs ships all the time since it's low-cost to fix later. The media companies make the same gamble as the software companies - most of the errors won't be embarrassing, so it's cheaper to be sloppy, ship stuff that hasn't been fully vetted and save on salaries, insurance and 401(k)s.
I get where you're coming from, but this isn't the print media of twenty years ago where errors were a lot less common and you could make a strong case with data that errors/retractions of this nature were disproportionately occurring in coverage of minorities. If you wanted to convince me that this was casual racism, you'd have to replicate historical findings for print media in today's media. I'm willing to be convinced if you can point me to the data that backs the position up.