Time

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ten years too young mate.

I'll buy it. From 5% of its RRP.

I'll wire you the £5,000 then.

Watches are so named as a reminder - if you don't watch carefully what you do with your time, it will slip away from you.


I haven't worn a watch for a long time, and the freedom of not being chained to the clock has been rejuvenating, however time eventually catches up with you, but I am not so sure that I can again adorn the shackles. A watch is like a handcuff.
 
Watches are so named as a reminder - if you don't watch carefully what you do with your time, it will slip away from you.


I haven't worn a watch for a long time, and the freedom of not being chained to the clock has been rejuvenating, however time eventually catches up with you and I am not so sure that I can again adorn the shackles. A watch is like a handcuff.

I can't be arsed getting my mobile out all the time to check the time.
 
FFS i gave a sensibleish answer, and you all come and hijack the thread.


Anyway, time is money.
 
Surely its not a matter of time but distance.

Some do say that and like I said;

An explanation can be provided for the above that isn't necessarily attributed to time but the example illustrates for me that time can be manipulated

...Are the two not intertwined?. The greater the distance, the further back in time you see.
 
Some do say that and like I said;



...Are the two not intertwined?. The greater the distance, the further back in time you see.


But by the same reasoning, if we looked at the star from earth we're lookng at it in its Tudor or Ice age era - so argueably we're in the future!

So the variable is distance.
 
But by the same reasoning, if we looked at the star from earth we're lookng at it in its Tudor or Ice age era - so argueably we're in the future!

So the variable is distance.

The example was given to demonstrate how time can seemingly be manipulated. I could have went into time dilution, how time changes in motion etc etc but kept it simple given the context of the forum (y)

Get past the example, the question was "Can time be manipulated?"
 
The example was given to demonstrate how time can seemingly be manipulated. I could have went into time dilution, how time changes in motion etc etc but kept it simple given the context of the forum (y)

Get past the example, the question was "Can time be manipulated?"

handbag.jpg
 
The example was given to demonstrate how time can seemingly be manipulated. I could have went into time dilution, how time changes in motion etc etc but kept it simple given the context of the forum (y)

Get past the example, the question was "Can time be manipulated?"

yeah course. Pull out the twisty thing on yer watch
 
Time. On the surface the concept is relatively simple. For most, it is in large, just a measuring system used to sequence events. Hardly captivating but the concept of time is an area that has always fascinated me.

If I could have one answer to any question, it wouldn’t be the answer to how life began, nor what, if anything occurs after death. It wouldn’t even be if Tony Hibbert will ever score. These questions have never interested me, mainly because I largely suspect the answers to be fairly predictable and hardly awe inspiring. Thats right, I'm saying the origin of life is boring.

If I was allowed one definite answer to any question, it would certainly be on time. What is time? Is it as simple as the definition given above? What causes time? Is time an emergent concept? What is the definite answer for why time slows in gravity and motion? Is time a dimension?

I’m determined to keep this as short as possible. I’ve bored too many people to death on the topic but consider the following;

You have a torch. You turn it on and point the light to the night sky. The beam of light that leaves the torch does so at the speed of 186,000 miles a second (the speed of light). The distance that beam would travel over a year is what’s known as a light year.

469 light years away is a star known as WASP-2. Lets say your sat on this star with a telescope powerful enough to look back on Earth. If you looked through this telescope you wouldn’t see the earth as it is now, but as it was in Tudor times. If you where further away, say in the constellation of scorpius 20,000 light years away, you would see the Earth during the Ice age.
An explanation can be provided for the above that isn't necessarily attributed to time, but the example illustrates for me that time can be manipulated. Most will disagree and probably rightly so, but for me - time isn't set in stone.

Still awake? What do you all think?

This bit was really interesting.. never thought of it that way..
So say your in a space ship cruising at the speed of light but some how able to maintain a clear visual of earth, you would have a front row seat to the evolution of earth.. Nice thread..
 
The example was given to demonstrate how time can seemingly be manipulated. I could have went into time dilution, how time changes in motion etc etc but kept it simple given the context of the forum (y)

Get past the example, the question was "Can time be manipulated?"


I would say no, i still reckon its distance if you could travel at say so many times the speed of light you would be cutting the speed of distance rather then time. If you got speed to balance out against distance you wouldnt be traveling in time.

At what point does the distance meet at 50% from say the star to earth and the earth to the star surely that midpoint is the closest each get to each others actual time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top