Spot on mate, he is a bang average goalkeeper who has only declined.I've never been a fan of his tbh.
Had some great games for us, and had a few runs of very good form, but he's never been good enough in my eyes. Thanks Tim and all that....
Goalkeepers often can make the difference between winning and not winning things so our next keepers has to be a top goalie.
*tourettes
Plus his tourettes is ticks not swearing.
Talk about your own national team. You know, the one that finished behind Tim and the U.S. the past 2 World Cups. You're welcome to our clueless coach though.Stephen Hawking would have saved that.
Talk about your own national team. You know, the one that finished behind Tim and the U.S. the past 2 World Cups. You're welcome to our clueless coach though.
Talk about your own national team. You know, the one that finished behind Tim and the U.S. the past 2 World Cups. You're welcome to our clueless coach though.
Good to see so many people rewriting history so elegantly.
Or is it a goldfish mentality that judges everything on what they've just seen rather than looking at Tim Howard's total time with us. Comments such as "bang average" and "mediocre" are not worthy of appearing on such a prestigious forum as this.
I wasn't suggesting that goldfish are imbeciles, or indeed that fans who don't rate Tim Howard are either aquatic or imbeciles. Just that these much-maligned fish and some posters on here share short memories.Have watched him from his initial loan period right through. I'd rate him, across the period, as above average but not someone I'd write home about. However, I wouldn't label others as aquatic imbeciles if they happen to disagree with me.