Tim Howard

Joey66 · February 12, 2016

hallamblue said:
He had a bit of an excuse last season. Howard wasn't quite as bad as this season, and Joel didn't look very assured in the games he played. Some of his positional play was suspect last year, but this season Howard has deteriorated and Joel seems to have progressed.

He's been bad for 18 months as Timmy should never have come back in after Robles three clean sheets the home game Tim played at then bottom team Leicester he flapped at two crosse = two goals against, = he should have been dropped there and then! we drew 2-2 when we should have won 2-0 same story in most games since!

ilikecheese · February 12, 2016

So much drama.

Enjoy your Friday FFS.

Logans run · February 12, 2016

Leighton Baines struggling to regain Everton spot as Roberto Martinez admits reluctance to changing winning formula

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...e-changing-winning-formula.html#ixzz3zyMkXNBv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
My interpretation on this headline is that he can justify leaving out Howard by illustrating that Baines, whom without question, is one of our best players if he cannot be a certain starter neither can Howard.
Very clever or maybe I am wrong, but let us hope.

Logans run · February 12, 2016

jaybx1878 said:
Is there really a market on this? Robles is buying money at 6/4

If correct yes, in the process of opening an account, just in case

Pittsburgh Footy · February 12, 2016

jaybx1878 said:
Is there really a market on this? Robles is buying money at 6/4

That Joel line is free coin

Jump on

Walken · February 12, 2016

Logans run said:
Leighton Baines struggling to regain Everton spot as Roberto Martinez admits reluctance to changing winning formula

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...e-changing-winning-formula.html#ixzz3zyMkXNBv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
My interpretation on this headline is that he can justify leaving out Howard by illustrating that Baines, whom without question, is one of our best players if he cannot be a certain starter neither can Howard.
Very clever or maybe I am wrong, but let us hope.

Not sure he needs spin to justify dropping howard, just volley him out

Logans run · February 12, 2016

Walken said:
Not sure he needs spin to justify dropping howard, just volley him out

I agree, but sometimes you have to wear a velvet glove, over that iron fist

LinekersLegs · February 12, 2016

Logans run said:
Leighton Baines struggling to regain Everton spot as Roberto Martinez admits reluctance to changing winning formula

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...e-changing-winning-formula.html#ixzz3zyMkXNBv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
My interpretation on this headline is that he can justify leaving out Howard by illustrating that Baines, whom without question, is one of our best players if he cannot be a certain starter neither can Howard.
Very clever or maybe I am wrong, but let us hope.

Aye and Baines won't kick up a fuss about Oviedo playing behind the scenes, he'll just get his head down and train harder which Martinez can also point to if Howard acts up.

Woolly Blue · February 12, 2016

davek said:
Howard and Stones are still injured according to the OS.

I'd be surprised if either one was on the bench tomorrow never mind starting.

I wouldn't take too much notice of the official injured list on the OS, but I too, will be surprised if Howard's even on the bench tomorrow. I'd guess Stones has an outside chance of making the bench though.

The acid test on Howard will be who starts against Villa and West Ham.

davek · February 12, 2016

Woolly Blue said:
I wouldn't take too much notice of the official injured list on the OS, but I too, will be surprised if Howard's even on the bench tomorrow. I'd guess Stones has an outside chance of making the bench though.

The acid test on Howard will be who starts against Villa and West Ham.

Before that, in fact: Bournemouth next week in the cup: if Howard plays in that it would underline the belief that he's now Robles' understudy - given RM's preference to retain his top keeper for PL games..

maccavennie · February 12, 2016

I can't believe how utterly terrible he is on Fifa. He's cost my 7 year old son a couple of goals and points this evening I can tell you.

sd_1992 · February 12, 2016

Woolly Blue said:
I wouldn't take too much notice of the official injured list on the OS, but I too, will be surprised if Howard's even on the bench tomorrow. I'd guess Stones has an outside chance of making the bench though.

The acid test on Howard will be who starts against Villa and West Ham.

Villa is the perfect game for Martinez to bring Howard in with the minimum damage (away and an easy game)... That is when we will have a definitive answer.... my guess is Howard will be back in goal for it unfortunately...

Donald Twain · February 12, 2016

I hope the fella is back for his sake ! Top servant and all round good egg!

Woolly Blue · February 12, 2016

davek said:
Before that, in fact: Bournemouth next week in the cup: if Howard plays in that it would underline the belief that he's now Robles' understudy - given RM's preference to retain his top keeper for PL games..

Sorry Dave, have to disagree with you there. It doesn't matter if Howard's fit or not, barring an injury to Joel, Robles will start against Bournemouth.

Donald Twain · February 12, 2016

maccavennie said:
I can't believe how utterly terrible he is on Fifa. He's cost my 7 year old son a couple of goals and points this evening I can tell you.

There's the only reason I'd ever consider jettisoning the bloke!