You have to wonder what the thought process was amongst these millionaire decision-making directors at Everton.
Situation: You have a single striker in the squad, and he is crap. He's a big tall gangly fella with a terrible first touch. You have £30m to strengthen your options, knowing that you cannot get it wrong. What do you do?
A. Invest the money in a more experienced striker, proven or not in the Premier League, that would at least offer something different than being all legs and a target for hoofball football.
B. Spend all £30m on one unproven lad from abroad in exactly the same mould as your current, crap striker, and simply hope he'll be able to hit the ground running in his first season, knowing that if he doesn't then the team is in big trouble.
C. Split the available funds between two up-and-coming strikers that each offer something different, perhaps a speed merchant and one with a clinical record in his short career so far. £15m each should get two interesting prospects from abroad.
(Obviously there would be further options open to the club, loans with options, obligations, selling players to generate more money, etc.)
I have no idea how they thought option B was the way to go. They are surely sorely regretting that now.