You prefer watching football being played to analysing spreadsheets?I'd rather watch the player myself and judge.
Football is more enjoyable that way,in my EXTREMELY humble opinion.
You prefer watching football being played to analysing spreadsheets?I'd rather watch the player myself and judge.
Football is more enjoyable that way,in my EXTREMELY humble opinion.
I was just joshing you chiefnot really, hes scored 11 goals but he should of scored 12.
So the chances hes missed equates to 1 goal. So either hes missed a shed load of shots from places of low xg that he was never going to score from (outside the box or really poor angels) or hes missed a few really good chances (which could be a miss on his part or keepers making fantastic saves).
So which ever way you look at it the xg says hes not missing alot of clear cut chances.
I don't dispute the stats but it takes the enjoyment out of sports.As someone who also loves baseball, it's hilarious seeing football fans fighting the exact same "stats vs. eye test" war that baseball fans already fought 25 years ago. (BTW, stats won the war in a rout).
Also, as we're not the ones actually doing the scouting for the club there's no real point to it other than being able to be correct on the internet. And as far as I know, no one bothers trying to do that..I don't dispute the stats but it takes the enjoyment out of sports.
It puts paid to discussion and opinion.
I like sitting in the pub with my mates and discussing why I think said player is good or bad from how I view the game.
As soon as you pull a stats and pie charts it ends all debate.
It's boring.
I don't dispute the stats but it takes the enjoyment out of sports.
It puts paid to discussion and opinion.
I like sitting in the pub with my mates and discussing why I think said player is good or bad from how I view the game.
As soon as you pull a stats and pie charts it ends all debate.
It's boring.
So let me get this straight in my own mind.You mean the stats that professional football scouts use?
The eye test trumps nothing because people are blinded by bias and as such see what they want to see most of the time.
Stats are facts not opinion and theres a reason why teams are finding major success signing players using these stats. Only have to look across the park to see that.
FWIW: Isak had a 6 goal season in La Liga when he was Barry's age (22).
Imagine what his xG charts looked like for that season![]()
In saying that Doucoure’s impact when he played for Everton was even greater, yet 95% of the fan base didn’t want him.The main stat that I would pay attention to is his impact for his team; how they perform with him vs without.
Villarreal’s win percentage with Barry is at 55%, compared to 40-45% without him.
21/22 season (season before he joined Newcastle) isak scored 6 goasl and had a xg of 11
Can you please express this opinion in graph form? The very least you could do is display it in a Venn diagram.As someone who also loves baseball, it's hilarious seeing football fans fighting the exact same "stats vs. eye test" war that baseball fans already fought 25 years ago. (BTW, stats won the war in a rout).
As someone who also loves baseball, it's hilarious seeing football fans fighting the exact same "stats vs. eye test" war that baseball fans already fought 25 years ago. (BTW, stats won the war in a rout).
Surly that’s Tarquin?The 2 most camp names in the history of mankind