Watch both russia and china bounce up.I see he's signed the Tariff order.
Wonder what the Dow will do on Monday morning,
I genuinely don't know what will happen.
Watch both russia and china bounce up.I see he's signed the Tariff order.
Wonder what the Dow will do on Monday morning,
I genuinely don't know what will happen.
LL. I’ve missed you, and your well sourced, well referenced points.For this minuscule amount of fentanyl we are apparently going into a trade war with one of our closest allies.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyjs...-justified-by-us-immigration-and-drug-claims/
In Fiscal Year 2024, USCBP seized 21,148 pounds of fentanyl at the southwest border, mostly smuggled from Mexico. In contrast, only 43 pounds were intercepted at the northern border. This means that less than 1% of all fentanyl seizures occurred at the U.S.-Canada border.
Furthermore, drug flows are not a one-way street. In 2024, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) seized approximately 10.8 pounds of fentanyl coming into Canadafrom the United States. In comparison, CBSA reported that 17.6 pounds of fentanyl were smuggled from Canada into the U.S. This suggests that the trafficking issue is not as one-sided as the administration claims.
Nah, we get it. We've got private schools and a publicly funded school system which is marketized with league tables, usually the better ones end up dominated by the middle classes who buy houses to get into the right neighbourhood or spend fortunes to coach their kids through entrance exams.I dont think a lot of people, particularly rural Americans, get the need for DEI.
Here's a study in Boston from 10 years ago
According to a 2015 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston study, the median net worth of Black households in Greater Boston was $8, compared to $247,500 for white households.
When you localise school districts, pretty much all the black families live in neighborhoods with lower tax bases and therefore have the worst schools.
Kids don't get the opportunity to go to better schools/colleges.
The game is rigged. DEI was an attempt to even out the spread a tiny bit.
If you think DEI is depriving the best people from getting the best jobs, you're very much mistaken.
I know most of the American posters on here get this but those from the UK might not.
As an aside, I've never understood why school funding is based off your towns tax base and not your states tax base. The difference in standards of kids schools from town to town is insane and it only widens (by design),
Right but it's way more localized here.Nah, we get it. We've got private schools and a publicly funded school system which is marketized with league tables, usually the better ones end up dominated by the middle classes who buy houses to get into the right neighbourhood or spend fortunes to coach their kids through entrance exams.
Self contained racist 'white-flight' miasma?Right but it's way more localized here.
So there are private schools but the public schools are mostly funded by local property tax.
So you could have a town with a population of about 20,000 and the average yearly property tax on a home could be around $8,000.
Once you live in this town, they are obliged to educate your kid.
So rather than make the decision to send kids to private school, a lot of people move to these small towns so their kids get the best education.
This drives up property values and the tax base and the schools get more and more funding and the towns get more and more exclusive and white.
Diversity is priced out.
There could be a town bordering it with 20k population but people are leaving for the next town over and the property values are shrinking, the amount of kids is decreasing and the schools are being defunded. This is inevitably where the people of color and immigrants end up.
Then, weirdly, these poorer towns start gentrifying because young professionals with no kids start getting on the property ladder.
This starts driving up values, drives up taxes and landlords pass the costs on to tenants. So the diverse community gets shoved out as soon as the area gets any way liveable and replaced by white educated 20 somethings. But the tax base is going up so when these 20 somethings have kids, there'll be more funding for the local underfunded schools.
Ha, kinda lost the run of myself there.
But unless there is movements like DEI, these cycles are never broken.
Wealthy white men rely on them never being broken.
Yeah, doesn't sound too dissimilar here. Bigger class divide as well as race.Right but it's way more localized here.
So there are private schools but the public schools are mostly funded by local property tax.
So you could have a town with a population of about 20,000 and the average yearly property tax on a home could be around $8,000.
Once you live in this town, they are obliged to educate your kid.
So rather than make the decision to send kids to private school, a lot of people move to these small towns so their kids get the best education.
This drives up property values and the tax base and the schools get more and more funding and the towns get more and more exclusive and white.
Diversity is priced out.
There could be a town bordering it with 20k population but people are leaving for the next town over and the property values are shrinking, the amount of kids is decreasing and the schools are being defunded. This is inevitably where the people of color and immigrants end up.
Then, weirdly, these poorer towns start gentrifying because young professionals with no kids start getting on the property ladder.
This starts driving up values, drives up taxes and landlords pass the costs on to tenants. So the diverse community gets shoved out as soon as the area gets any way liveable and replaced by white educated 20 somethings. But the tax base is going up so when these 20 somethings have kids, there'll be more funding for the local underfunded schools.
Ha, kinda lost the run of myself there.
But unless there is movements like DEI, these cycles are never broken.
Wealthy white men rely on them never being broken.
And it isn’t just funding of schools.Right but it's way more localized here.
So there are private schools but the public schools are mostly funded by local property tax.
So you could have a town with a population of about 20,000 and the average yearly property tax on a home could be around $8,000.
Once you live in this town, they are obliged to educate your kid.
So rather than make the decision to send kids to private school, a lot of people move to these small towns so their kids get the best education.
This drives up property values and the tax base and the schools get more and more funding and the towns get more and more exclusive and white.
Diversity is priced out.
There could be a town bordering it with 20k population but people are leaving for the next town over and the property values are shrinking, the amount of kids is decreasing and the schools are being defunded. This is inevitably where the people of color and immigrants end up.
Then, weirdly, these poorer towns start gentrifying because young professionals with no kids start getting on the property ladder.
This starts driving up values, drives up taxes and landlords pass the costs on to tenants. So the diverse community gets shoved out as soon as the area gets any way liveable and replaced by white educated 20 somethings. But the tax base is going up so when these 20 somethings have kids, there'll be more funding for the local underfunded schools.
Ha, kinda lost the run of myself there.
But unless there is movements like DEI, these cycles are never broken.
Wealthy white men rely on them never being broken.
Yup, around Boston, you just have to take a highway in to the city and see which sections have sound barriers protecting the abbuting communities and which dont. Follow that up by measuring population density/air quality/asthma rates and even cancer rates. All the areas without the walls are black or immigrant communities, without exception.And it isn’t just funding of schools.
There is the whole environmental issue of pollution impacts on attendees at schools in low income districts - lead being the classic example.
RFK used to pretty good on the subject, he now seems to have decided his unfounded “vaccines cause autism” stance gains him more money and power.
His talk also highlighted some of the ongoing major clean air and water battles within the US, such as the oil pipeline project in North Dakota, and worries about a rollback of major environmental laws should Donald Trump become president. Trump supports the coal industry and vows to axe programs such as the Clean Power Plan, which forces electricity producers to cut emissions and is currently being contested in court.The North Dakota pipeline project, which the Standing Rock Sioux tribe contends will pollute their water supply and decimate their cultural heritage, exemplifies the effort by big business and investors to make it difficult for America to move away from fossil fuels, Kennedy said.“They lock our nation into a dinosaur form of fuel that stops us from transitioning into a more efficient form of energy,” he said, calling low-carbon energy like solar and wind “cheap, green, patriotic fuel from heaven”.![]()
Robert F Kennedy Jr takes big business to task over pollution at SXSW Eco
‘Good environmental policy is good for economic prosperity,’ according to the environmental advocate, who admonished corporations for not doing morewww.theguardian.com
One of the most poignant points made by Kennedy was that poor communities often suffer the most from environmental devastation, yet they are least equipped to fight it. This point has also been made by developing countries as they seek funding from first-world nations to address climate change.“Polluters always choose the soft target of poverty,” said Kennedy, who noted, as an example, that the highest concentration of toxic waste dumps in America resides in the south side of Chicago.
For this minuscule amount of fentanyl we are apparently going into a trade war with one of our closest allies.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyjs...-justified-by-us-immigration-and-drug-claims/
In Fiscal Year 2024, USCBP seized 21,148 pounds of fentanyl at the southwest border, mostly smuggled from Mexico. In contrast, only 43 pounds were intercepted at the northern border. This means that less than 1% of all fentanyl seizures occurred at the U.S.-Canada border.
Furthermore, drug flows are not a one-way street. In 2024, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) seized approximately 10.8 pounds of fentanyl coming into Canadafrom the United States. In comparison, CBSA reported that 17.6 pounds of fentanyl were smuggled from Canada into the U.S. This suggests that the trafficking issue is not as one-sided as the administration claims.
What has marriage got to do with transportation? Is this just planning for population increases?
What about the needs of communities that are aging and switching more from private to public transport?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.