Here's the thing though when something pushed initially by activists (which by the very nature means they are extremist view - no need for activism if it's the commonly held view (in the purest origin of the word)) becomes the mainstream (at least in terms of how it's portrayed as being mainstream) viewpoint, then the extreme has become the mainstream.
Also to hold one opinion on one subject which may be termed woke doesn't mean you should hold all perceived woke viewpoints on the subjects deemed thus.
On just the points you listed as your views, I'd argue the case or merit on several and certain I'd agree with completely.
When challenged, 9/10 (if not 9.9) people who have just used it in an insulting way can never say what the viewpoints held by 'woke' people are.
That is the struggle we have with people who think 'wokeism' actually exists as a thing. If they were clear about what they mean, with specific examples, then we can have a rational debate with them as to how it exists but when we don't have any clue as to what they mean then we have to assume they have opinions and ideas that should be confined to the history books.