The Ronaldo case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rightly or wrongly, his defence team will quite quickly invite any prosecutors to explain why she did not name him earlier, including to the LVMPD during enquries.

Also, to explain why she accepted a large amount of money for her silence instead of alerting the authorities. Those two factors will complicate any prosecution.
 
Rightly or wrongly, his defence team will quite quickly invite any prosecutors to explain why she did not name him earlier, including to the LVMPD during enquries.

Also, to explain why she accepted a large amount of money for her silence instead of alerting the authorities. Those two factors will complicate any prosecution.

Didnt she go to the police the day out of the rape. Its was documented and photographs were taken.
 
Didnt she go to the police the day out of the rape. Its was documented and photographs were taken.
She did go to the LVMPD, but they've stated that at no point did she identify her attacker; whether that was because she was unable or it was a choice is unclear.

I'm not implying it suggests that she is lying or that he is innocent of any crime, merely that his defence team will use it and the deal as a strong counter-argument.
 
It's only right the authorities investigate this thoroughly because it's very serious.

But I find the legal experts on social media who have already made their mind up one way or the other and hold such extreme views either way, very very weird.
See also: Alfie Evans. So many neurologists and paediatricians on social media! My word!
 
Wonder what'll happen to the girl if he's found innocent.

Well he’s already paid her out once hasn’t he so I don’t think she likely to face any criminal charges , reasonable doubt goes both ways so good luck persuading anyone that she’s guilty beyond Reasonable doubt of making false allegations . So my guess if no charges face him or he’s acquitted nothing , other than she’ll probably get a lot of stick online and sympathy from others.

I think if the reporting of the document in which he allegedly accepts she said no and asked him to stop is true , I’ve no idea if it is , then that’s clearly huge and will cause him massive problems legally.

I don’t know enough about the case but things in it , that document for one are a concern that’s for sure . For me I think it’s easy for a lot of people to believe the allegations against Weinstein because he hasn’t really got fans and the same with glitter and Cosby to a degree . Once you get to Tyson and Jackson you see that being a fan can sometimes make it hard to people to believe the worst .
 
If this document is legit, then it's hard to imagine otherwise ... I doubt he'll get into serious trouble though (apart from his sponsors dropping him one by one etc...). I don't like the practice of NDA's, settlements etc... Shouldn't be possible on such matters.

He thought he was getting lucky, went up to his/her room. She changed her mind, he got cross. He anally raped her. No is no.



763
 
She did go to the LVMPD, but they've stated that at no point did she identify her attacker; whether that was because she was unable or it was a choice is unclear.

I'm not implying it suggests that she is lying or that he is innocent of any crime, merely that his defence team will use it and the deal as a strong counter-argument.

So when did she identify him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top