Current Affairs The next Tory (strong and stable) leader is Boris Johnson

[peteblue]

Your raving like a madman Pete, your beginning to sound like Boris.

Na he's just desperate like his idol Boris. The party is definitely over.

I’ve always found in here that when someone loses the argument they resort to personal comments and retorts.…..

 

[mahermi1]

…


Starmer had previously apologised for the Savile issue and Boris reminded him that he had had to do so at today’s PMQ’s. It begs the question of why he originally apologised…….

If that's the case is Boris going to apologise for the 175,000 Covid deaths, because he presided over the Country all through this ?

 

[Jebus_lives]

You must feel proud of yourself Pete. Good grief.

Takes a special sort of arsewipery to declare investigation of child sex offences was "spaffing money up a wall" and then offend victims of one of the most notorious of child sex offenders the country has ever known..

 

[mahermi1]

I’ve always found in here that when someone loses the argument they resort to personal comments and retorts.…..

Truth hurts Pete, sorry your taking it personal, just take your emotion out of it, Johnson's a dead Duck mate.

 

[peteblue]

This is all you have left, isn’t it? Sad old farts, up and down the country desperately clinging on to a sinking ship.

If that's the case is Boris going to apologise for the 175,000 Covid deaths, because he presided over the Country all through this ?

Truth hurts Pete, sorry your taking it personal, just take your emotion out of it, Johnson's a dead Duck mate.

Bottom of the barrel stuff here lads. Come on you can do better than this surely…..

 

[Jebus_lives]

He's not going to take him to court because Johnson is hiding behind parliamentary privilege. Even if he wasn't, the logic of "he must be right because the target hasn't sued him" is retarded. I could understand that when Joe used it when talking about that crap book about Corbyn because Joe is, well, Joe. I kind of figured you were a bit smarter than that.

Really?

 

[mahermi1]

Bottom of the barrel stuff here lads. Come on you can do better than this surely…..

Wow, just wow, the lack of self awareness is incredible. You defend the indefensible and attack Sir Keir Starmer who at least has dignity, honesty and respect. Unbelievable you need to remove your head from Johnson's backside mate and get some fresh air..

 

[Bruce Wayne]

I‘m not trying to score political points. The BBC article correctly says that Starmer was not involved in Savile, Boris however didn’t say he was either. But Starmer keeps insisting that the head of an organisation should carry the can, he even gave a public apology in the past and Boris is technically correct in what he said and even double downed on it today in PMQ’s. Now I’m pretty sure that while he may have made his first comments in the heat of the moment, I cannot believe for one second that clever legal people in government have not checked what he said and indeed cleared what he coldly repeated today.….

It wasn't a spur of the moment remark. PMQs isn't improv, it's well rehearsed. He was advised beforehand not to make the remark and yet blundered on regardless because he doesn't take advice.

 

[peteblue]

It wasn't a spur of the moment remark. PMQs isn't improv, it's well rehearsed. He was advised beforehand not to make the remark and yet blundered on regardless because he doesn't take advice.

Having taken a lot of stick, not even Boris would have repeated it again today had he not been on firm ground…..

 

[peteblue]

Wow, just wow, the lack of self awareness is incredible. You defend the indefensible and attack Sir Keir Starmer who at least has dignity, honesty and respect. Unbelievable you need to remove your head from Johnson's backside mate and get some fresh air..

I think the lack of this man’s self awareness should be the point of discussion…

 

[Jebus_lives]

After reading the Daily Mail article, it's hard to know who to believe at this point...

A man, and his cronies, using parliamentary privilege to make a baseless accusation out of desperation about Savile or the victims of Savile?

Difficult to know what side is telling the truth here...

 

[Gabagool]

If you close your eyes, it sounds like he's shagging him

 

[tsubaki]

I think the lack of this man’s self awareness should be the point of discussion…


View attachment 154522

Ironically pete having a drink with co-workers isn’t (and wasn’t) illegal.

Having people go to a place for a party was, hence why your boy is in all the trouble.

 

[dublinbluenose]

BBC reporting that Johson stepped in last year when the home office wanted to replace the head of the MET.

 

[ChesterBlue]

I‘m not trying to score political points. The BBC article correctly says that Starmer was not involved in Savile, Boris however didn’t say he was either. But Starmer keeps insisting that the head of an organisation should carry the can, he even gave a public apology in the past and Boris is technically correct in what he said and even double downed on it today in PMQ’s. Now I’m pretty sure that while he may have made his first comments in the heat of the moment, I cannot believe for one second that clever legal people in government have not checked what he said and indeed cleared what he coldly repeated today.….

Boris heavily implied he was though, which is parroted directly from literal fascists. It’s indefensible, as with most of Boris’s actions.

I can understand yourself being a conservative mate, and despite the fact it means that politically there are a lot of things we will never agree on I can respect that - but surely you can’t deny that Boris’s behaviour is completely disgraceful and he is becoming more and more like Donald Trump