D
Deleted member 48881
Guest
Kremlin calls Boris Johnson’s Ukraine diplomacy efforts ‘utterly confused’
Moscow ramps up criticism of Britain’s bid to be at helm of fight to protect Ukraine from Russian invasion
Current Affairs The next Tory (strong and stable) leader is Boris Johnson
- Thread starter summerisle
- Start date
- Status
I’d be careful with that to be honest. I have no idea of the inner workings of the CPS and I doubt the journalist does either but they are using some harrowing cases to try and score political points and appeal to their readership. It is beyond deplorable and is massively disrespectful to all the victims.
ANDREW PIERCE: Keir Starmer's CPS did fail to prosecute Jimmy Savile
ANDREW PIERCE: Keir Starmer was ultimately responsible for the decision not to bring charges against the serial paedophile Jimmy Savile (pictured).www.dailymail.co.uk
Your defending that ? Get out of the gutter, you do realise that two more of your party have gone after Johnson, with one actually mentioning his disgust over the empty Saville accusation. Johnson is a desperate man, running, hiding throwing mud against th a wall hoping some will stick. While hiding behind Parliamentary privilege, Churchill my arse.
Your supporting the Daily Mail now ? Didn't they support Hitler ?
Agreed, proper grim claim to throw out of the blue baselessly. What’s worse is it’s coming from a man I can guarantee doesn’t give a damn about any of the victims, seen as he clearly doesn’t give a damn about anyone but himself.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
…
Starmer had previously apologised for the Savile issue and Boris reminded him that he had had to do so at today’s PMQ’s. It begs the question of why he originally apologised…….
Rishi Sunak rebukes Boris Johnson for Savile comment and key aide Munira Mirza quits
Rishi Sunak has publicly rebuked Boris Johnson for accusing Sir Keir Starmer of failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile as one of the prime minister’s closest aides qwww.thetimes.co.uk
Starmer had previously apologised for the Savile issue and Boris reminded him that he had had to do so at today’s PMQ’s. It begs the question of why he originally apologised…….
He's not going to take him to court because Johnson is hiding behind parliamentary privilege. Even if he wasn't, the logic of "he must be right because the target hasn't sued him" is retarded. I could understand that when Joe used it when talking about that crap book about Corbyn because Joe is, well, Joe. I kind of figured you were a bit smarter than that.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Don’t get upset. Put your emotion aside and address the facts. Starmer had had to apologise over the Savile affair, he can’t now claim it was nothing to do with him……
Yes, the facts say you're talking out of your backside as you plumb the depths to try and score political points.
No evidence for Boris Johnson's claim about Keir Starmer and Jimmy Savile
The PM's claim that Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Savile is not backed up by any evidence.
www.bbc.co.uk
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
I didn’t say anything about taking Boris to court. The newspaper put out its own views and said the same as Boris. If Starmer is right he should sue the Mail. But having previously apologised for his and the CPS failings over this matter my guess is that he would lose, and he knows it…..
You must feel proud of yourself Pete. Good grief.
Your raving like a madman Pete, your beginning to sound like Boris.
Let's wait and see...Kremlin calls Boris Johnson’s Ukraine diplomacy efforts ‘utterly confused’
Moscow ramps up criticism of Britain’s bid to be at helm of fight to protect Ukraine from Russian invasionwww.theguardian.com
I'm sure Boris will bring Putin to heel just like he did those German car manufacturers
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Yes, the facts say you're talking out of your backside as you plumb the depths to try and score political points.
No evidence for Boris Johnson's claim about Keir Starmer and Jimmy Savile
The PM's claim that Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Savile is not backed up by any evidence.
I‘m not trying to score political points. The BBC article correctly says that Starmer was not involved in Savile, Boris however didn’t say he was either. But Starmer keeps insisting that the head of an organisation should carry the can, he even gave a public apology in the past and Boris is technically correct in what he said and even double downed on it today in PMQ’s. Now I’m pretty sure that while he may have made his first comments in the heat of the moment, I cannot believe for one second that clever legal people in government have not checked what he said and indeed cleared what he coldly repeated today.….
larrygobfiend
Player Valuation: £40m
This is all you have left, isn’t it? Sad old farts, up and down the country desperately clinging on to a sinking ship.
- Status