roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
no, the former party establishment
Gotcha. I think.
no, the former party establishment
Blame the lizards.
And why would the Icke followers plagiarise it? Because it’s exactly the stupid, anti Semitic garbage they eat up.For you not seeing plagiarism. Time will tell.
Havnt got skin in this game, but that bit about supporting a political group that isnt Labour seems a bit weird. Like I assume, it means one in opposition to Labour, in an election, but it doesnt say that.
But anyrate, anyone who doesnt think booting Campbell out is anything other than spiteful, is deluded.
Blame the lizards.
And why would the Icke followers plagiarise it? Because it’s exactly the stupid, anti Semitic garbage they eat up.
It’s the same as Corbyns speeches being used completely out of context. Sacrifice is the wrong word for what the blokes describing, but he has a valid point.
Or to put it through the Lizard filter for you:
Mainstream Media! Illuminati! FEMA Death Camps! Rothschilds!
Such intemperate language against MPs has been condemned by MPs and the public, they have demanded action taken against such individuals. But no word of condemnation has been heard in this instance. Odd that.Human sacrifice is defined as ‘the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual.’ What sort of god does the BoD’s Senior Past President wish to appease?
...why did Icke publish it? Because it’s exactly the tripe those that follow him lap up. It’s ‘The Jew’ trying to subvert politics.What 'anti semitic garbage'? Quoting a former Board of Deputies president who talks about 'sacrificing' Corbyn.
"Speaking to The Canary, the Emeritus Professor of Operational Research at the London School of Economics, Jonathan Rosenhead, added:
Such intemperate language against MPs has been condemned by MPs and the public, they have demanded action taken against such individuals. But no word of condemnation has been heard in this instance. Odd that.
And 'what valid point does he have'? Maybe his dislike of Corbyn for 'the trouble he has caused' has prompted him to want a 'sacrifice'.
'Trouble he has caused'.
Jewish historian recalls when Jeremy Corbyn saved a Jewish ...
https://www.thecanary.co/.../jewish-historian-recalls-when-jeremy-corbyn-saved-a-jew...
"Jewish historian Geoffrey Alderman recalled an anecdote about Jeremy Corbyn on 8 May. Back in 1987, the Labour leader successfully campaigned to stop property developers taking over a Jewish cemetery.
Fighting a Hodge-led council to save a Jewish cemetery
And it turns out that Margaret Hodge, who has smeared Corbyn as an antisemite, was leader of Islington Council at the time. Although Hodge’s personal view is unspecified, under her leadership the council approved “destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies” to build for-profit properties.
Alderman, who’s authored many books on Jewish history, wrote that the 176-year-old cemetery was of “great historic and architectural interest”.
If a person who is 'discredited' in this case Icke, uses information from another source then that original source is then 'discredited'. Incredible logic.
...why did Icke publish it? Because it’s exactly the tripe those that follow him lap up. It’s ‘The Jew’ trying to subvert politics.
He has a point in that Corbyn has caused problems for Jewish people by not confronting anti semitism more directly, instead he’s employed his usual wishy washy tactics and sort of implied it’s in their heads.
There’s been no condemnation because in the grand scheme of things, the bloke is a comparative non-entity.
And don’t pretend that the meaning of sacrifice still relates only to that quote from an ‘expert’ (quite what a business professor has to do with linguistics or politics is beyond me.) it’s been bastardised beyond it’s more traditional usage. Again probably wasn’t the right word.

Your point is? 2016 was about appealing to the middle class, which he failed to do, thanks in part to an over reliance on what Momentum thought he should be doing.June 2016 - THERE'S NO WAY THAT CORBYN CAN BE LEADER OF THE COUNTRY. HE'S A LITERAL COMMUNIST SPY WHOSE PRINCIPLES, ONLY LISTENING TO THE LOONY LEFTY PARTY MEMBERSHIP IN TWINE WITH A LACK OF COMPROMISE WILL DESTROY THE COUNTRY.
June 2019 - THERE'S NO WAY THAT CORBYN CAN BE LEADER OF THE COUNTRY. HE'S A FENCE SITTER WHO HAS NO PRINCIPLES THAT DOESN'T LISTEN TO THE MEMBERSHIP - COMPLETELY UNFIT TO LEAD.
Your point is? 2016 was about appealing to the middle class, which he failed to do, thanks in part to an over reliance on what Momentum thought he should be doing.
In 2019 he should be appealing to either Leavers or Remainers. His party understands this and is trying to push him in a direction. Instead he’s still chugging along like Brexit isn’t that important. And it’s losing support for the party massively.
How does increasing the tax the wealthy pay actually ‘do’ anything for the middle classes though?Targeting the middle class by...
*squints at notes*
increasing the amount of tax people that earn > £80,000 will have to pay.
Cool.
Imagine pretending that it's a binary issue. The simple fact of the matter is, that to repair the damage Cameron et al has inflicted on this country, we all need to compromise somewhat. Labour's manifesto clearly states that the party will respect the result of the referendum, and will negotiate a deal that guarantees a level of alignment with Europe on things like workers rights and environmental protection.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.