Michelle Dewbury has been backed to the gunnels by "Lord" Alan Sugar. She's done his bidding. And we all know what that rancid get thinks of Corbyn.
A criminal conviction is not the metric I'm asking for. She appears to believe that "evidence" is her tweeting her opinion she'd been abused on her account and / or someone claiming to be a member of Momentum abusing her.
Is that the criteria we should lower proof of bullying to?
As I said elsewhere above: if you want to condemn bullying maybe you can start by condemning the day to day character assassination of Jeremy Corbyn....which is very real and has already resulted in him being ASSAULTED.
I don't know what evidence she has as Mason talked over her at every opportunity. I quite agree btw that the person attacking Corbyn is reprehensible. I'm not sure there can be any doubt about that, but I hoped it wouldn't be a case of tit for tat or wharraboutism. One of the endearing features of Corbyn's emergence on the front bench was his appeal for a better form of politics that wasn't the playground squabbling it so often becomes. That must apply to all of his disciples too, surely?