Current Affairs The Labour Party

[zzr45]

Despite the link to a conclusive Government report and the last two prime ministers both May and Cameron recognise social inequality and you believe there is no inequality in the UK or it does not matter and then resort to personal insults to try and shut down being challenged, you need to check on the definition of bigotry. And I dont even believe you even know the negatives of social inequality and consequences of it or understand its concept.

Typical consequence of this book,

https://www.bitebackpublishing.com/books/bluffocracy

No, I don’t think social inequality exists to the extent reported. There’s a difference. I earn less money than I would doing the same job in the NW as I would in London. That would be a measure of social inequality. However, the truth is that I’d actually be poorer for working in London. Even comparing neighbourhoods in London seems a bit pointless as you’ll have outliers at both ends making the situation look far more extreme than it is. I’d be interested in a report that negates London really.

I do love your narrative though, when you start throwing shade and people get annoyed at your bigotry, then it’s them who are in the wrong. Mmm.

It’s okay mate, people are richer than you. Just accept it.

 

[zzr45]

The Rowntrees organised themselves and put their money where their mouth was, as fwiw did Carnegie, Peabody and the rest. They did a lot of good and the evidence is still around us today.

The difference here of course is that this is public money (or at least money from the public) and that it is being focused on a very small group of people who happen to be even better connected than the normal establishment.

Look at your man Tristram Hunt for example, who got the top job at the V&A despite having no experience of running a museum. Or James Purnell, who glided gently between Oxford, helping Blair, a senior job at the Beeb (in his early 20s), a safe seat, ministerial office, various wonkages and finally £295k p.a back at the Beeb.

These are the people who tell you about being fiscally prudent by the way.

Then doesn’t that become cronyism, rather than an issue of class per say?

 

[roydo]

No, I don’t think social inequality exists to the extent reported. There’s a difference. I earn less money than I would doing the same job in the NW as I would in London. That would be a measure of social inequality. However, the truth is that I’d actually be poorer for working in London. Even comparing neighbourhoods in London seems a bit pointless as you’ll have outliers at both ends making the situation look far more extreme than it is. I’d be interested in a report that negates London really.

I do love your narrative though, when you start throwing shade and people get annoyed at your bigotry, then it’s them who are in the wrong. Mmm.

It’s okay mate, people are richer than you. Just accept it.

Less of the personal abuse mate. Warned you once.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

No, I don’t think social inequality exists to the extent reported. There’s a difference. I earn less money than I would doing the same job in the NW as I would in London. That would be a measure of social inequality. However, the truth is that I’d actually be poorer for working in London. Even comparing neighbourhoods in London seems a bit pointless as you’ll have outliers at both ends making the situation look far more extreme than it is. I’d be interested in a report that negates London really.

I do love your narrative though, when you start throwing shade and people get annoyed at your bigotry, then it’s them who are in the wrong. Mmm.

It’s okay mate, people are richer than you. Just accept it.

So May and Cameron are wrong with their reports and what they say about social inequality?

 

[zzr45]

So May and Cameron are wrong with their reports and what they say about social inequality?

I mean, I’ve just given my exact reasoning why I don’t think it’s as bad as stated, mainly a very skewed use of measurement. What do you think?

 

[Moomin]

So May and Cameron are wrong with their reports and what they say about social inequality?

Didn't the commision quit last year??

Social mobility is at its worse since pre WW2 according to a report i heard on 5 live a few months back.

Daily Mail will probably blame the immigrants for this.

 

[Moomin]

No, I don’t think social inequality exists to the extent reported. There’s a difference. I earn less money than I would doing the same job in the NW as I would in London. That would be a measure of social inequality. However, the truth is that I’d actually be poorer for working in London. Even comparing neighbourhoods in London seems a bit pointless as you’ll have outliers at both ends making the situation look far more extreme than it is. I’d be interested in a report that negates London really.

I do love your narrative though, when you start throwing shade and people get annoyed at your bigotry, then it’s them who are in the wrong. Mmm.


It’s okay mate, people are richer than you. Just accept it.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

I mean, I’ve just given my exact reasoning why I don’t think it’s as bad as stated, mainly a very skewed use of measurement. What do you think?

Lots of, "look over here, don't look over there" approach. Fuelled by utterly broken housing market (And nope i don’t rent, I own with small mortgage before you start again with feathering my cap accusations). One thing social inequality does best, that’s divide it’s no coincidence the UK is currently polarised and divided!

Didn't the commision quit last year??

Yes Milburn quit, the whole team did!

 

[zzr45]

Lots of, "look over here, don't look over there" approach. Fuelled by utterly broken housing market (And nope i don’t rent, I own with small mortgage before you start again with feathering my cap accusations). One thing social inequality does best, that’s divide it’s no coincidence the UK is currently polarised and divided!
Yes Milburn quit, the whole team did!

I’m not sure how we got to the housing market with you being unable to accept that middle class journalists might have valid points. But yes.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

I’m not sure how we got to the housing market with you being unable to accept that middle class journalists might have valid points. But yes.

First London and now you want to take housing out of social inequality, what next ignore poor people, and look the other way. We are back to bigotry and its not me!

 

[zzr45]

First London and now you want to take housing out of social inequality, what next ignore poor people, and look the other way. We are back to bigotry and its not me!

???????

I’m really unsure of what’s going on right now.

 

[Groucho]

Really? You don’t know jack about me at all pal. Let’s just say if you’d said that to my face you’d be more concerned about the mobility of your limbs in the near future...

But, again, why does it matter where someones come from over what they are actually saying? Does that mean that the Rowntrees should have kept their mouths shut in the 1900s, because as upper class people, what could they possibly have to contribute?

Oh I'm going g to tell my mammy of you and if you going to dish it out expect it back or grow up.
1900s is that the example of your debate, the good old days hey of no holidays for the working man, I get it.

I’m not dishing it out at all. You don’t know me, yet your happy to paint me as a hooray Henry because I think it’s ridiculous that people are judged on what class they belong to, rather than the arguments, discussion or whatever else they produce.

Your posts have dripped with chip on the shoulder envy, ‘spring water cooler’ ‘poverty porn’ ‘conscious sated for 5 minutes.’ You’re such a bigot it is actually untrue.

And don’t bother your mam. She’ll be entertaining her upper class customers.

Lads this makes you look stupid.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

???????

I’m really unsure of what’s going on right now.

Lads this makes you look stupid.

I’m trying to work out the definition of social inequality being applied; evidently there is more than one, while being threatened with violence. All because I typed the BBC liked poverty porn for the chattering classes at the water cooler.

 

[zzr45]

I’m trying to work out the definition of social inequality being applied; evidently there is more than one, while being threatened with violence. All because I typed the BBC liked poverty porn for the chattering classes at the water cooler.

All the while avoiding the original question as to why it was okay to have somebody’s output judged based on their social class, whereas to do so on any other measure would rightly be seen as appalling.

That somehow got into social inequality, which I don’t think is as a huge of an issue as suggested and that current measurements aren’t exactly the best. Apparently this makes me some fluffer for the upper classes, despite coming from a not exactly great background and doing alright.

Anyway I think it’s for the best for everyone if I stick you on ignore.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

Anyway I think it’s for the best for everyone if I stick you on ignore.