Current Affairs The Labour Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, my opinion is that the LP should not be a unionist party. It should have supported self-determination in Scotland. The nationalist vote up there rests a lot on socialiists who have found refuge from Blairism in the SNP with it's mildly collectivist approach to politics. Scotland could be a sovereign nation who are leftist by proclivity. Just let them go.


That wont happen though because the LP nationally (Uk-wide) need Scotland to get control of Westminster. As said, the SNP could be in for a spell of blood-letting now and that can help Corbyn into No10.

I agree with most of that mate. However politics is about more than crude numbers. If Scotland went there own way, built a broadly left, inclusive country then it would show clearly to lots of people in England that it was possible. I think it would snap some sections of the left out of desperation.

The other thing is that the Tories won 2015 in no small part down to the fact of attacking Scotland and it's links to Labour. Take them out of the picture and there is that option removed.

Labour need to start connecting to people in England. It won elections in 1997, 2001 and 2005 in England and would have had a majority without Scottish Mp's. It can be done. The Labour party post 2010 has already been increasing it's vote in Ruk and that trend dramatically increased in 2017.

I think the pessimism if "we can never win without Scotland" is not only untrue, but deeply unhelpful and has to be challenged.
 
I agree with most of that mate. However politics is about more than crude numbers. If Scotland went there own way, built a broadly left, inclusive country then it would show clearly to lots of people in England that it was possible. I think it would snap some sections of the left out of desperation.

The other thing is that the Tories won 2015 in no small part down to the fact of attacking Scotland and it's links to Labour. Take them out of the picture and there is that option removed.

Labour need to start connecting to people in England. It won elections in 1997, 2001 and 2005 in England and would have had a majority without Scottish Mp's. It can be done. The Labour party post 2010 has already been increasing it's vote in Ruk and that trend dramatically increased in 2017.

I think the pessimism if "we can never win without Scotland" is not only untrue, but deeply unhelpful and has to be challenged.

The problem is that Labour won those elections by being ‘Tory Lite’. As the mask slips from the Corbyn’s ‘a new kind of politics’ he will be viewed more and more as hard left, and many on here support him in that. However, back to the problem though, the people of England do not want a hard left government, and I suspect neither do Wales nor Scotland even though they are more likely to wish so. But Labours conundrum is that besides doing well in England, they need all of the SNP seats, and they primarily are nationalists, but not necessarily socialists. If Scotland ever becomes independent, you will never see the current Labour Party win an election outright. It’s these little regional rivalries that keeps us on the straight and narrow.........
 
I agree with most of that mate. However politics is about more than crude numbers. If Scotland went there own way, built a broadly left, inclusive country then it would show clearly to lots of people in England that it was possible. I think it would snap some sections of the left out of desperation.

The other thing is that the Tories won 2015 in no small part down to the fact of attacking Scotland and it's links to Labour. Take them out of the picture and there is that option removed.

Labour need to start connecting to people in England. It won elections in 1997, 2001 and 2005 in England and would have had a majority without Scottish Mp's. It can be done. The Labour party post 2010 has already been increasing it's vote in Ruk and that trend dramatically increased in 2017.

I think the pessimism if "we can never win without Scotland" is not only untrue, but deeply unhelpful and has to be challenged.
Yes, there's a good argument to be made for that.
 
The problem is that Labour won those elections by being ‘Tory Lite’. As the mask slips from the Corbyn’s ‘a new kind of politics’ he will be viewed more and more as hard left, and many on here support him in that. However, back to the problem though, the people of England do not want a hard left government, and I suspect neither do Wales nor Scotland even though they are more likely to wish so. But Labours conundrum is that besides doing well in England, they need all of the SNP seats, and they primarily are nationalists, but not necessarily socialists. If Scotland ever becomes independent, you will never see the current Labour Party win an election outright. It’s these little regional rivalries that keeps us on the straight and narrow.........

I think there's a lot of sense in that Pete. There's no doubt Labour won elections convincingly and were also "tory Lite". I am not sure one leads to the other automatically though. I think by 1997 there was enormous discontent with the Conservatives and a big appetite for change. I think that had a far bigger role than Labour moving to the right. (though I do fully accept under our electoral system, you win by being in the centre as a general rule).

I personally think people increasingly do actually want a government of both the hard left or the hard right. People seem to be moving to increasingly "extreme" measures, in no small part because the institutions that provide stability are fraying. The same is true within the Conservatives, your bog standard, centrist politicians are finding themselves increasingly out of touch with members and voters. Populism around migration, welfare and on the other side nationalisation and egalitarianism remain increasingly popular.

That jars though, against our system which is win elections in the centre. It's a contradiction nobody has solved an answer too. May and Corbyn won't solve that contradiction, I doubt Johnson or Umuna will either.

It's an extremely fluid situation. I don't believe a "tory lite" Labour would win the next election full stop. Going for a full on reverse Brexit would be very damaging. So too would be adopting an "austerity lite" model that Balls/Miliband tried too.

Labour energised it's base very effectively at the last election. Outside of Scotland it was the biggest vote it has had in decades. I am of the view, a repeat of this performance will likely see Labour win, because I can see the Conservatives slipping support in most directions (particularly towards UKIP). The issue for Labour is going to be how they govern effectively. Thatcher never really had a massive mandate because she won because the centre left vote was split. The same lack of legitimacy affected Brown (but in reverse) and could well affect Corbyn.
 
I think there's a lot of sense in that Pete. There's no doubt Labour won elections convincingly and were also "tory Lite". I am not sure one leads to the other automatically though. I think by 1997 there was enormous discontent with the Conservatives and a big appetite for change. I think that had a far bigger role than Labour moving to the right. (though I do fully accept under our electoral system, you win by being in the centre as a general rule).

I personally think people increasingly do actually want a government of both the hard left or the hard right. People seem to be moving to increasingly "extreme" measures, in no small part because the institutions that provide stability are fraying. The same is true within the Conservatives, your bog standard, centrist politicians are finding themselves increasingly out of touch with members and voters. Populism around migration, welfare and on the other side nationalisation and egalitarianism remain increasingly popular.

That jars though, against our system which is win elections in the centre. It's a contradiction nobody has solved an answer too. May and Corbyn won't solve that contradiction, I doubt Johnson or Umuna will either.

It's an extremely fluid situation. I don't believe a "tory lite" Labour would win the next election full stop. Going for a full on reverse Brexit would be very damaging. So too would be adopting an "austerity lite" model that Balls/Miliband tried too.

Labour energised it's base very effectively at the last election. Outside of Scotland it was the biggest vote it has had in decades. I am of the view, a repeat of this performance will likely see Labour win, because I can see the Conservatives slipping support in most directions (particularly towards UKIP). The issue for Labour is going to be how they govern effectively. Thatcher never really had a massive mandate because she won because the centre left vote was split. The same lack of legitimacy affected Brown (but in reverse) and could well affect Corbyn.

I hated Thatcher, but the point about governing effectively is the key one - up until the Poll Tax that is what she did (at least in the short to medium term - all the problems she caused appeared later) and why she won; a sufficient number of voters trusted her.

Likewise the clear decline in support for centrists is probably down to sufficient numbers of voters recognising that they did not govern effectively nor is there any evidence they would. At the end of the day most people are not fools and if you discredit with good reason the centre then left and right will benefit.
 
I see that a senior Labour MP, Mike Gapes, has called Corbyn a ‘racist anti-semite’and stating that he will not support Corbyn and will quit the party.....
 
I see that a senior Labour MP, Mike Gapes, has called Corbyn a ‘racist anti-semite’and stating that he will not support Corbyn and will quit the party.....

I wouldn't want to see any Labour MP quit the Party, but after Woodcock I would probably care the least about Gapes if he left (and he hasn't yet).

The man is odious, as his recent visit to a country engaged in bombing kids and executing witches (and which is about to execute a woman for attending a peaceful protest) a few months ago showed.
 
Mike Gapes of Labour Friends of Israel?

That Mike Gapes?

He has no dog in this fight, does he?

I think you are missing the point. Whoever he loves and supports, a Labour MP has called his party leader a racist anti-semite and announced he will leave the party. He has been a Labour MP for 26 years and spent 15 years prior to that working in Labour HQ. This is not some new guy with an axe to grind. You can ignore what Corbyn is doing, you can excuse what Corbyn has said and done, but for someone who has spent over 40 years intimately part of the Labour movement to say he will leave the party because of Corbyn is actually a big deal. If MP’s are thinking it, you can put money on the fact that Labour voters and supporters are also thinking it....Or you could just dismiss it and have a go at them as well.....
 
Telegraph

“Come election time, many of Jeremy Corbyn’s words will be read back to him, but none so poignant as these, delivered a year ago as President Maduro was sending in riot squads to squash anti-government protests: “The issues in Venezuela are partly structural because not enough has been done to diversify the economy away from oil – that has to be a priority for the future.
But we also have to recognise that there have been effective and serious attempts at reducing poverty, improving literacy and improving the lives of the poorest people”.

Meanwhile Millions are trying to leave the country......how could the Labour Party pick a leader, so stupid, that he would still defend an absolute basket case of a country......
 
I think you are missing the point. Whoever he loves and supports, a Labour MP has called his party leader a racist anti-semite and announced he will leave the party. He has been a Labour MP for 26 years and spent 15 years prior to that working in Labour HQ. This is not some new guy with an axe to grind. You can ignore what Corbyn is doing, you can excuse what Corbyn has said and done, but for someone who has spent over 40 years intimately part of the Labour movement to say he will leave the party because of Corbyn is actually a big deal. If MP’s are thinking it, you can put money on the fact that Labour voters and supporters are also thinking it....Or you could just dismiss it and have a go at them as well.....

Pete, Gapes is someone who has never accepted Corbyn as leader. He said in 2015 that he'd be as loyal to Corbyn as he (Corbyn) had been to other Labour leaders and has spent the time since doing that, including agreeing with May whenever he can.

I'd also point out that, despite years of absolute loyalty and a lifetime working for Labour, no Labour leader ever trusted him with any kind of responsibility.
 
Pete, Gapes is someone who has never accepted Corbyn as leader. He said in 2015 that he'd be as loyal to Corbyn as he (Corbyn) had been to other Labour leaders and has spent the time since doing that, including agreeing with May whenever he can.

I'd also point out that, despite years of absolute loyalty and a lifetime working for Labour, no Labour leader ever trusted him with any kind of responsibility.

So everything’s fine then.......
 
I think you are missing the point. Whoever he loves and supports, a Labour MP has called his party leader a racist anti-semite and announced he will leave the party. He has been a Labour MP for 26 years and spent 15 years prior to that working in Labour HQ. This is not some new guy with an axe to grind. You can ignore what Corbyn is doing, you can excuse what Corbyn has said and done, but for someone who has spent over 40 years intimately part of the Labour movement to say he will leave the party because of Corbyn is actually a big deal. If MP’s are thinking it, you can put money on the fact that Labour voters and supporters are also thinking it....Or you could just dismiss it and have a go at them as well.....

I've no doubt plenty are, and I'm starting to feel it might do for Corbyn in the end.

I have my suspicions that the game is far from straight, however: www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-s-hidden-hand-behind-attacks-jeremy-corbyn-139423040
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top