Current Affairs The Labour Party

[peteblue]

It

Wuz

chelsea

!

No

It

Wuz

China……

 

[Rita_Poon]

It wuz....

sunak
windrush
small boats
putin
gordon brown
tony blair
saddam
the miners
black urban youth
chinese pharma
wokes
trans
knee takers
nike branding
to much rain
to little rain
french customs checks
the deep state
deeply entrenched ultra left hidden truss masterplan destroyers
the queens longevity
woking pizza express
mayor khan
Ulez
booze duty
and, jamie's vegan cookbook.

Is there anyone or anything else?

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

Wouldn't it be great if everyone could kick the tribalism.

 

[peteblue]

Wouldn't it be great if everyone could kick the tribalism.

It would be nice……

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

Starmer is now starting to spell out more and more the solutions in regards to "boat crossings".

Such as re cooperating with other countries on agreements to return them.

Rejoining security and intelligence sharing agencies in Europe.

Targeting smugglers.

Addressing the backlog of processing asylum seekers.

Starmer would halt Rwanda flights immediately under Labour government

The Labour leader spoke to Sky News's Beth Rigby about Rwanda, winning a majority, his newest MP and whether he would do a deal with the Lib Dems.

news.sky.com

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Such as re cooperating with other countries on agreements to return them.

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

Starmer is now starting to spell out more and more the solutions in regards to "boat crossings".

Such as re cooperating with other countries on agreements to return them.

Rejoining security and intelligence sharing agencies in Europe.

Targeting smugglers.

Addressing the backlog of processing asylum seekers.

Starmer would halt Rwanda flights immediately under Labour government

The Labour leader spoke to Sky News's Beth Rigby about Rwanda, winning a majority, his newest MP and whether he would do a deal with the Lib Dems.

news.sky.com

Its good to see some sensible thinking as opposed to the tory lot just parroting "stop the boats".

 

[orchard]

 

[mightymoyes]

I see labour have got themselves a real vote winner with the young by not letting them drive.
Where do they find idiots like Kim leadbeater?

 

[davek]

Natalie Elphicke’s anti-strike stance ‘incompatible’ with Labour, says TUC president

Exclusive: Matt Wrack describes ex-Tory’s views as ‘disgraceful’ after she blamed deaths on striking firefighters

www.theguardian.com

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Natalie Elphicke’s anti-strike stance ‘incompatible’ with Labour, says TUC president

Exclusive: Matt Wrack describes ex-Tory’s views as ‘disgraceful’ after she blamed deaths on striking firefighters

www.theguardian.com

Dunno what Labour are thinking here. This will now run until the election now. Anyone voting Tory at this stage of the game are hardly going to be changing their mind now.

 

[davek]

Dunno what Labour are thinking here. This will now run until the election now. Anyone voting Tory at this stage of the game are hardly going to be changing their mind now.

The whole affair underlines what a cack handed politician Starmer is.

 

[Blue 1]

I see labour have got themselves a real vote winner with the young by not letting them drive.
Where do they find idiots like Kim leadbeater?

She's Jo Cox's sister, and only got into politics to honour her sister's memory.

 

[hallamblue]

The whole affair underlines what a cack handed politician Starmer is.

The idea of a political party is to offer a way forward to run the country for us, as it's our money they're spending. Starmer seems to think we can be a one party state where all views are accommodated and the Labour Party stands for, what exactly? I certainly don't know at the moment. I'll probably vote for them, more in hope than expectation.

 

[davek]

The idea of a political party is to offer a way forward to run the country for us, as it's our money they're spending. Starmer seems to think we can be a one party state where all views are accommodated and the Labour Party stands for, what exactly? I certainly don't know at the moment. I'll probably vote for them, more in hope than expectation.

Even that scab Neil Kinnock doesn't know what they are now.

I can tell him: they're a right wing liberal-democratic party probably not even as progressive as the U.S. Democratic Party these days.

Just look at the language from them on immigration and big business and patriotism.

They really should have the decency to drop the word 'Labour' from their name. It's misleading to say the least. They are a party that's been transformed into corporate Britain's best bet to continue with their ambitions to privatise the whole of the UKs social and economic life.

Anyone who votes for them doesn't get the right to criticise them thereafter when it all goes tits up. That's because they've been told by the Starmer cult exactly what they won't be getting.

Vote for them and you face that.