Current Affairs The Labour Party

[Rita_Poon]

Gonna be mad when these lot come in, do absolutely nothing, and then wonder why they are absolutely hated to the core. Clowns.

An interesting view. Perhaps they'll continue to do the work of the last 13 years and further decimate what is left. Could be great couldn't it...

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Gonna be mad when these lot come in, do absolutely nothing, and then wonder why they are absolutely hated to the core. Clowns.

If anything, you’d imagine it will be a single term as part of a weak coalition unless they do something radical.

 

[Toffee_Loaf]

Even by the standards of that cesspit, that is a remarkably misleading article.

Labour "refused to be drawn on who attended the meeting" and "pointed towards his ambiguous Commons statement", even though the same article says who went, says Lammy dialled in to some of it and was not physically in London anyway.

I understand why you may think that, but actually it isn't. You need to look at it from the point of view of the publisher. If they said Lammy wasn't there, it would be libellous - since they can't prove it or say where Lammy was. By printing what Labour sources say they have a verified independent source unwilling to state simply that Lammy was there.

 

[Rita_Poon]

oh toffee toffee, toffee toffee toffee toffee toffee oaf!

I wonder have you already activated the resuscitation of your next sleeper account, keep the bot spam spamming...

 

[Toffee_Loaf]

oh toffee toffee, toffee toffee toffee toffee toffee oaf!

I wonder have you already activated the resuscitation of your next sleeper account, keep the bot spam spamming...

It's you that is spamming. Why don't you contribute constructively to these topics? Are you another person that fears being challenged and exposed?

Grow up and move on.

 

[Rita_Poon]

shat ap you stinking balloon knot!

 

[JimmyJeffers]

It's you that is spamming. Why don't you contribute constructively to these topics? Are you another person that fears being challenged and exposed?

Grow up and move on.

Let me tell you a story about my brother in law. He was getting bi-weekly massages from Boris Johnson but these had to stop because of the wokes and David Lammy and Biden’s laptop.

He got very sad at not being able to get his massage that he fell face first into a puddle and couldn’t move. People said to him ‘get your face out of there’ but he was so sad he just died.

Can anyone who votes labour seriously say they did not kill this man?!

I thought as much

 

[Rita_Poon]

bloody woke puddles, we need to arm pavements, that'll curb this danger...

 

[tsubaki]

I understand why you may think that, but actually it isn't. You need to look at it from the point of view of the publisher. If they said Lammy wasn't there, it would be libellous - since they can't prove it or say where Lammy was. By printing what Labour sources say they have a verified independent source unwilling to state simply that Lammy was there.

Of course its misleading - they knew Lammy wasn't there, and who was there, and yet they claimed to have sussed him because of the strange language he used at the despatch box.

What almost certainly happened is that Lammy didn't attend in person, and someone in the government told them. They then made a load of stuff up.

 

[orchard]

An interesting view. Perhaps they'll continue to do the work of the last 13 years and further decimate what is left. Could be great couldn't it...

Be like:

 

[Rita_Poon]

Be like:

And the name drop...

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

Of course its misleading - they knew Lammy wasn't there, and who was there, and yet they claimed to have sussed him because of the strange language he used at the despatch box.

What almost certainly happened is that Lammy didn't attend in person, and someone in the government told them. They then made a load of stuff up.

Anything about their knees?

 

[Moomin]

Anything about their knees?

Bloody woke have them naked!!!!

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

Bloody woke have them naked!!!!

Pure filth.

 

[Moomin]

Pure filth.