Really bad weather being forecast for Dec 12th. Should keep a lot of the old brexit-loving gammons indoors!
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
Really bad weather being forecast for Dec 12th. Should keep a lot of the old brexit-loving gammons indoors!
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
I can safely say that we are about 6 months away from you admitting that you made a terrible mistake Joey.
Lets just hope you can type it.
Really bad weather being forecast for Dec 12th. Should keep a lot of the old brexit-loving gammons indoors!
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
You'll be happy to sacrifice all the employment associated with public infrastructure works then?
When your car wheel gets damaged by potholes just remember your post.....I can safely say that we are about 6 months away from you admitting that you made a terrible mistake Joey.
Lets just hope you can type it.
Really bad weather being forecast for Dec 12th. Should keep a lot of the old brexit-loving gammons indoors!
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow!
By diverting cash from road building projects to subsidising rail travel.
Long term, it's the right thing to do. Whether or not drivers will see it that way remains to be seen.
When your car wheel gets damaged by potholes just remember your post.....

If it's a choice between one or the other then yes, yes I would.
Getting more people on trains will, even taking into account some of the fleet is still diesel, and a lot of the electrified lines won't be powered by renewables, still lower our emissions
If the aim is to get more people on trains then we'll need to invest in more rolling stock, which will have to be built ( probably outside the UK to be fair ) and maintained, which will employ people. Those extra trains will need people to drive them, and admin staff to support the extra work, so employing more people in long term, not short term, work.
You can't just put more trains on the network because, at rush hour, it operates at pretty much full capacity, so we'd need to speed up the digitisation of the network ( both signalling and route planning ), which involve kitting out hundreds, of not thousands of trains with the required technology, updating our antiquated signalling system and installing the software needed to control it. So that would support suppliers of the hardware and software and ... employ more people.
Or, we could build more roads, and, as well as in the short term burn more fossil fuels in a pretty inefficient way of getting people from A to B, in the medium to long term we'd be going more down the route of people travelling by electric cars, which are pretty inefficient and will need more power generating like for like compared to rail.
We could just build more and more low carbon power stations, but, some time in the next two or three decades, we're likely to need to move away from using gas boliers to heat space, and will need more electric generating capacity to power things like heat pumps.
TL;DR ?
Yes, yes I would.
Good answer!
Beeching and his cuts are probably some of the most short sited and state sponsored vandalism ever bestowed on to the UK.
Adam Price has landed some quite telling blows on Labour shadow ministers who don't seem to have grasped that Labour are running the NHS in Wales.In Wales they also have the issue of being basically a one-party failed state. Welsh Labour must be one of the most inept governing parties (left, right or centre) in Christendom.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.