Current Affairs The General Election

Voting Intentions

  • Labour

    Votes: 209 61.1%
  • Tories

    Votes: 30 8.8%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 20 5.8%
  • Brexit Gubbins

    Votes: 8 2.3%
  • Greens

    Votes: 8 2.3%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Change UK, if that's their current moniker

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • SNP

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • DUP

    Votes: 3 0.9%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 9 2.6%
  • Alliance

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 2 0.6%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • Some fringe party with a catchy name

    Votes: 7 2.0%
  • A plague on all your houses

    Votes: 32 9.4%

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
how is it a remarkable reading, 62% say give us free stuff but only 32% say nationalise BT......

Because they were two separate questions, Pete.

62% approved of the overall idea, with 22% opposed and 16% don't know. For how Labour were going to do it, 32% approved, 31% opposed and there were 37% don't know (from here).
 
I see I'm talking to myself, but hey, someone might read it.

If Labour follow the lead of the French Digital Services act and apply a similar tax levy on companies at roughly the same points of 3% on digital services targeted at UK users. At current the French model is set at €750 million on global services and €25 million on French specific services, both of those thresholds must be hit. The tax, they reckon will generate €500 million a year for France that's based on a user base of 44.9 million and an online spend of $42,674m per year.

In many ways, the online spend is a little redundant as this DST tends to focus more on taxing the provision of digital advertising, rather than goods sold via e-commerce. In that case it's better to look at the user base as these are the people companies are targeting and paying Google, Facebook etc to access. The userbase in the UK stands at 59.5m. So using a very simple fag packet formula each French user would be generating €11.13 in tax revenue. Applying that to the UK we'd get about €600m per year. It's estimated that the cost of the infrastructure a year would be £230m so, it's more than covered, but of course also need to factor in setup costs.

Labour have said they could potentially generated £6bn per year with their version of DST. I'm really not sure how they are going to do this without completely obliterating the way business is done online.

There's also the issue of cannibalisation of other taxable income. Already Amazon have passed the 3% onto companies that sell through their platform, so companies will have to pay this and either take the hit themselves or pass it onto consumers. When some companies are already operating on single figure profit margins, it seems an even tighter squeeze, that if more radical taxation is used could result in a lot of web based companies really struggling, especially if they are reliant on the bigger companies to reach customers.

So, I do hope Labour can provide something that shows where this money is coming from and can be done in a sustainable way that protects SME's reliant on Digital services.

 
I see I'm talking to myself, but hey, someone might read it.

If Labour follow the lead of the French Digital Services act and apply a similar tax levy on companies at roughly the same points of 3% on digital services targeted at UK users. At current the French model is set at €750 million on global services and €25 million on French specific services, both of those thresholds must be hit. The tax, they reckon will generate €500 million a year for France that's based on a user base of 44.9 million and an online spend of $42,674m per year.

In many ways, the online spend is a little redundant as this DST tends to focus more on taxing the provision of digital advertising, rather than goods sold via e-commerce. In that case it's better to look at the user base as these are the people companies are targeting and paying Google, Facebook etc to access. The userbase in the UK stands at 59.5m. So using a very simple fag packet formula each French user would be generating €11.13 in tax revenue. Applying that to the UK we'd get about €600m per year. It's estimated that the cost of the infrastructure a year would be £230m so, it's more than covered, but of course also need to factor in setup costs.

Labour have said they could potentially generated £6bn per year with their version of DST. I'm really not sure how they are going to do this without completely obliterating the way business is done online.

There's also the issue of cannibalisation of other taxable income. Already Amazon have passed the 3% onto companies that sell through their platform, so companies will have to pay this and either take the hit themselves or pass it onto consumers. When some companies are already operating on single figure profit margins, it seems an even tighter squeeze, that if more radical taxation is used could result in a lot of web based companies really struggling, especially if they are reliant on the bigger companies to reach customers.

So, I do hope Labour can provide something that shows where this money is coming from and can be done in a sustainable way that protects SME's reliant on Digital services.

We'll see that explanation rolled out over the weekend.

Meanwhile, they're ahead of the game and, politically on this, picking up support.

Job done.
 
I see I'm talking to myself, but hey, someone might read it.

If Labour follow the lead of the French Digital Services act and apply a similar tax levy on companies at roughly the same points of 3% on digital services targeted at UK users. At current the French model is set at €750 million on global services and €25 million on French specific services, both of those thresholds must be hit. The tax, they reckon will generate €500 million a year for France that's based on a user base of 44.9 million and an online spend of $42,674m per year.

In many ways, the online spend is a little redundant as this DST tends to focus more on taxing the provision of digital advertising, rather than goods sold via e-commerce. In that case it's better to look at the user base as these are the people companies are targeting and paying Google, Facebook etc to access. The userbase in the UK stands at 59.5m. So using a very simple fag packet formula each French user would be generating €11.13 in tax revenue. Applying that to the UK we'd get about €600m per year. It's estimated that the cost of the infrastructure a year would be £230m so, it's more than covered, but of course also need to factor in setup costs.

Labour have said they could potentially generated £6bn per year with their version of DST. I'm really not sure how they are going to do this without completely obliterating the way business is done online.

There's also the issue of cannibalisation of other taxable income. Already Amazon have passed the 3% onto companies that sell through their platform, so companies will have to pay this and either take the hit themselves or pass it onto consumers. When some companies are already operating on single figure profit margins, it seems an even tighter squeeze, that if more radical taxation is used could result in a lot of web based companies really struggling, especially if they are reliant on the bigger companies to reach customers.

So, I do hope Labour can provide something that shows where this money is coming from and can be done in a sustainable way that protects SME's reliant on Digital services.


Kinell. @Old Blue 2 any music links for this please?
 
I don't think Corbyn and McDonnell care in the slightest about the economics behind their policies. They are more concerned with playing to the gallery.

The reality is that all that spending on nationalisation needs to be funded by someone. It will either be ordinary people through tax hikes or by the generations to come who are left to deal with all the debt.

People just don't understand the tax system. "Just tax Google Starbucks and Amazon" more is a sure sign someone hasn't a clue what they are talking about.
It wouldnt be just a limited amount of companies though it would be everyone in the higher tax bracket paying more, with zero income tax rises for ordinary people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top