The Farhad Moshiri interview

[blue4eva77]

We've added 8 players, how can that not be good?

And go on then, I'm game; £50 to a charity of the other persons chosing

I'd rather it be 200 quid towards the GOT forum. A donation towards the forum we post on, support it.

@nsno-chris @GrandOldTeam

 

[jal123]

This has been shown to be nonsense so often it's beyond ridiculous now.

Can anyone tell me Monaco's net spend this summer?

 

[nsno-chris]

I'd rather it be 200 quid towards the GOT forum. A donation towards the forum we post on, support it.

Well you can donate your to GoT, I'd like mine go towards Cancer Research UK, in particular Children's Cancer.

 

[meagher94]

Ha ha

By the time Barkley's treadmill stopped working, it was around 9/10 pm UK time.

Just so happens that also around that time rumours of Raul Jimenez were surfacing. How much ? Yep it was quoted as 35 million, exactly what we were getting for Barkley. It's absolutely laughable.

Barkley jumped off his treadmill, Jimenez pilot did a U turn near John Lennon. Pathetic.

McCarthy/Mirallas being sold in January would then equalize the expenditure/incoming.

Nothing has changed. As said.... the difference is that with Moshiri, we've now got some comfort in that we can wait until the next window before recouping the millions paid.

Moshiri. File him next to kenwright/Johnson in the Utter bollocks cabinet.

Jiminez probably was dependant on Barkley leaving, yeah. Either way we still would've had a +40m net spend if both of those deals happened, which is more than you would have seen pre-Moshiri. So he isn't the sugar daddy we wanted him to be... our future sure still looks a lot brighter with him in it than it did without him.

Farhad doesn't entirely take the fall for us not getting a striker in, no way. Ask the manager and DoF how they managed to spend £150m without getting an essential target man in.

 

[roydo]

I'd rather it be 200 quid towards the GOT forum. A donation towards the forum we post on, support it.

@nsno-chris @GrandOldTeam

I will answer for the boss on this.

If you two have a bet, for charity, then either choose a charity, but not GOT. The closest to GOT could be one of our charity partners.

You could both upgrade; that is support the boss does like.

 

[blue4eva77]

Well you can donate your to GoT, I'd like mine go towards Cancer Research UK, in particular Children's Cancer.

Fair enough.

So 200 notes ?

The bet:

@nsno-chris believes Everton will finish top 6 in the premier league.

@blue4eva77 believes Everton will not finish top 6 in the premier league.

The loser of the bet, pays 200 pounds to the winners charity of choice.

 

[LinekersLegs]

Sorry if this is already discussed but I can't find it - isn't this interview a hoax?

Apparently not mate, although like you that was my first thought as it was so odd.

 

[penev10]

Can anyone tell me Monaco's net spend this summer?

+£100.8m

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...w-2017-every-deal-in-europes-top-five-leagues

 

[Seathestars]

Sappie was right, nothing has changed.

Glaringly obvious after the Chelsea game that we are toothless upfront. Then we have two pensioners fighting for a center half position, top 4, dream on , won't even finish top half.

 

[formerly manx toffee]

He was pretty clear. We sold Barkley, he didn't fancy it so he will go in January

 

[when i score we riot]

So, uh, just to reignite this : Barkley said he never had a medical. Mosh said he did. Blatant lies on live TV? You don't get away with that in the information age.

 

[Eggsyblueskin]

So, uh, just to reignite this : Barkley said he never had a medical. Mosh said he did. Blatant lies on live TV? You don't get away with that in the information age.

But who's lying ?

 

[eddy]

But who's lying ?

`Mosharkley` ........ (cover all me bases with these £200 bets flying about)

 

[bluestevon]

Late to this, but reading through, you seem convinced that we didnt sign this Jimenez fella cos Ross wet his pants passing the M25.

Remind me; who did we sell to lob £45m at Swansea? Cos by my reckoning, Roms wedge was spent 5 weeks before that.

Not strictly true mate, remember although in the surface the figures look like we've right now,spent a fair bit in excess of what we brought on, most of our incomings will be staggered payments over the contract as per the usual way with transfers, but the Luksku sale we by reports got a huge amount (seen something like 50-60m quoted) up front.

Basically means short term Luksku covered all the incoming payments this summer with an excess. The thing to watch is future years now, because we will be paying out on this summer's purchases and won't have the payment from the lukaku sale coming in annually to offset those.

Short term at least we brought in more money than we paid out this summer.

 

[Petit]

Jiminez probably was dependant on Barkley leaving, yeah. Either way we still would've had a +40m net spend if both of those deals happened, which is more than you would have seen pre-Moshiri. So he isn't the sugar daddy we wanted him to be... our future sure still looks a lot brighter with him in it than it did without him.

Farhad doesn't entirely take the fall for us not getting a striker in, no way. Ask the manager and DoF how they managed to spend £150m without getting an essential target man in.

Agreed. Getting players through the door is Walsh job, not Koemans.