Julius Geezer
Player Valuation: £2.5m
On a brighter note , Coronation Street are to do a one off speial episode about Betty (rip) Bill is going to be in it.
That 14 million for coaching changes was unaccounted for. I projected them for around £35million in loses that financial year. Which is bad.
The coaching change. Well thats a killer. Remember this is last season's figures. So last summer you saw why they were selling.
I'd say net 2010/2011 - 2011/2012 they're still making loses of net about £25million even after the sales of Young/Downing.
That puts them about £150million in debt. Net.
Which is a rapidly declining financial position.
Which only now, are they even starting to get a grip of in wage (cost) terms.
AT LEAST WE'RE NOT VILLA.
While Learner continues to transfer some club fixed assets to his parent company in return for payment of some promissory notes and the club also pays his company interest on the rest of the notes, can you imagine the reaction if that happened here. Its the perfect pyramid scheme and no one seems to have cottoned on to it.
Its a matter of time until their relegated and smack Leeds mark 2.
Yep i would agree with that mate massive lack of forsight and no recognition of the economic climate. But i think its far from splitting hairs, there is a big difference between not judging the credit market place and the businses being knackered which is clearly isnt, we pushed the boat out then had to pull it back in. Its a bit of a laugh to actually compare it to Villa - whos big hurrah today was reducing their borrowing by 8.5 mill this year. If half the stuff that goes on their happened here their would be riots tbh. No doubt we have hit a glass ceillng though.
Bad management yes a club on the brink very much not. Will be interesting to see what difference the 13 mill makes to the over all debt and the selling of players has done to wages overall.
Whatever way you cut it mate, you and Damon were claiming we were safe moving forward with no need to dump players overboard to survive. That was completely and utterly wrong - regardless of whether that came to pass as a result of banks getting panicky with the club or not - and the pair of you might have the good grace to at least acknowledge it. Part of the panic was that the board ran up borrowings secured against revenue we were to recieve a couple of years ahead, and for a club of our stunted commercial development and a boardroom full of people with a track record of not investing, the financial house of cards was crashing to the floor...that's why we had the great firesale of 2011.
Still, at least you've responded to the charge overnight. Poor old Damon cant even bring himself to return to the subject.
Lol!
If you can find me the quote saying we had no need to dump players ill admit i was wrong happily!, i think after last Jan it was pretty evident we overshot the wage bill. I think its a bit misleading saying there was a firesale their weas clear context with Arteta and Pienaar, but safe to say we needed to reduce the wage bill on players like Yak, Vaghan, Beckford, Yobo etc. Equally we have seen reinvestment recently, wheather its a club recycleing a club needing to go through a measure of austerity to cut costs remans to be seen, the next set of accounts will tell us an awfull lot in terms of reduction of wages and overall debt. I dont think thats the sceario either in regard to securing the loan due against future revenue. I reinterate though the club isnt on the brink as was your point of view!
scratches head...this is all too complicated for me...are we being sold ffs
Davey boy just smashed the Review Team into hibernation there.
Davey boy just smashed the Review Team into hibernation there.
April 2010:
Damon:
"The mere fact that say compared to Villa, Everton's COST CONTROL has been tight and hasn't been allowed to spiral is a good thing. It makes us a more viable business because when costs inflate, they are very difficult to get back under control without say: doing a fire sale, losing far more long term and therefore damaging the club. I'd argue that given the fact that unlike other clubs Everton haven't ballooned their wage:turnover or debt level then YES WE CAN continue as suggested. We do not need to sell or cut costs."
You in response:
"Have to say i agree with Matthew on almost all of his points above, i can see the summer being a difficult one for almost all PL clubs, with fees and wages contracting everywhere bar the very top. In fact their wont be much movement at all and the bargain basement is likely to be overcrowded with shoppers this year. The burden of debt isnt sustainable for almost all PL clubs -Credit isnt readily accessable even if you can come acorss it your paying a mega rate of intrest. Yet we are nicely poised to sustain the impending storm with our cost vs turnover ratio, if we continue to manage the club as we have. In footballing terms we have a good young squad sprinkled with wiley old heads - we can be more then competitive with what we have and an astute small purchase or a loan. Speaking frankly Everton are in one of the best positions in the league to weather the impending storm."
Ergo: we had no necessity to dump players.
Quite obviously, in retrospect, we weren't in that position where we could keep the squad together as we weren't, in fact, "in the best position in the league to weather the impending storm", and the idea we had no need to cut costs is now risible in the light of what happened over the following 12 months.
It's the Financial Review team's 'Chamberlain back from Munich' moment. The calculations were way off. You both made calls based on what was going on around Everton at other clubs and couldn't see that our own house was smouldering and about to catch fire.
http://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/t...and-ownership?highlight=financial+review+team
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.