Billysgingham.
Player Valuation: £40m
No mate just innocent.Innocent with an asterisk.
No mate just innocent.Innocent with an asterisk.
Well, I'll go to the foot of our stairs, google backs you up on this.
Stand down @Mrtallywacker , Brother Billy has shown me the error of my ways.
I’d not read the whole thread when I repliedGet your own routine sheep worryer.
Good evening mate how are you doing today.Too err is human, to forgive is divine.
I’d not read the whole thread when I replied
#lesson learnt
Good evening mate how are you doing today.
Yes she is, but working on the same logic so is Hitler: he never went to court. The law is built on equality. Let’s see what the corner says.I agree with what you are saying I disagreed with the Hitler case.The Helen McCourt was an overwhelming evidence case of murder which got to court.But blacks never got to court so she is innocent.
I needs to check my posts before I send it obviously was meant to say flack.No mate I disagree as I said before one person to one person..not hundreds as to hitler.The same with saville overwhelming evidence for both him and hitler.Yes she is, but working on the same logic so is Hitler: he never went to court.
I needs to check my posts before I send it obviously was meant to say flack.No mate I disagree as I said before one person to one person..not hundreds as to hitler.The same with saville overwhelming evidence for both him and hitler.
Maybe but there are some occasions were you are safe in saying yep he was guilty ie hitler saville and some like flack where I am uneasy with it.I’m a huge believer innocent until proven guilty but by the same token you do seem slightly to be dancing on the head of a pin . In that you firmly believe in it unless there is ‘overwhelming’ evidence and you seem happy , yourself, to decide when and where that particular caveat applies.
Maybe but there are some occasions were you are safe in saying yep he was guilty ie hitler saville and some like flack where I am uneasy with it.
What I'm saying is it never went to court so she wasnt proven guilty, some think she done it some dont.I dont think there would be anyone backing saville in a debate.I’m not trying to be argumentative but ultimately i Hate to say it but I don’t think it helps your argument . If she’d been acquitted I thinks it’s a totally different discussion but to pick this particular hill to die on but being selective who gets the particular honour in my opinion undermines the stance .
What I'm saying is it never went to court so she wasnt proven guilty, some think she done it some dont.I dont think there would be anyone backing saville in a debate.
Yes.i agree.or Fred west , Jeffrey Epstein, Stephen Akinmurele, bin laden or plenty of others .
