This X 100%If only.
Labour to get its act together? Too much in fighting.
what is needed is a broad anti tory group to organise tactical voting.
when cons are removed it's time to
Change the FPTP voting system to something more representative.
This X 100%If only.
Labour to get its act together? Too much in fighting.
what is needed is a broad anti tory group to organise tactical voting.
when cons are removed it's time to
Change the FPTP voting system to something more representative.
scumbag move regardless of how effective it would be
If people do not want to work, or strike, then fair enough replace them.. Replacing people who want to work with someone cheaper is not on.…..
Everyone has a right to strike, when all negotiations have failed, especially with the cost of living crisis, energy and petrol bills soaring, food bills rising seemingly each week. As you know full well, it's not that people don't want to work, it's because people want to live. A scab is a scab, we now have a scab government.
Indeed, everyone has the right to look for a different well paid job. If they believe they will be paid better then go for it. No one has the right to demand a certain pay check because they can control the operational aspects of a company. If you are worth it, go and get it. However, if you are not, then get on with the job ……
I doubt they will,wouldn't put it past Starmer to come out in support of it.Mate I 100% agree with you, but do you think Labour will reverse this law, I for one don’t think there’s a chance in hell they will, loved to be proven wrong.
scumbag move regardless of how effective it would be
They simply won't.Wonder where they're finding 'highly skilled people' to do the jobs of those striking because their skills is not fully appreciated.
This is the thing isn't it? They regularly tout the low unemployment rate, and it is very low, but it's very low in many countries. For instance, Germany and the Netherlands have practically identical unemployment rates to here, and places like Poland, CZ, and Japan are even lower.Wonder where they're finding 'highly skilled people' to do the jobs of those striking because their skills is not fully appreciated.
Plenty of vacancies in "hero" jobs...nursing, social care, fire fighters, police etcThis is the thing isn't it? They regularly tout the low unemployment rate, and it is very low, but it's very low in many countries. For instance, Germany and the Netherlands have practically identical unemployment rates to here, and places like Poland, CZ, and Japan are even lower.
The problem is one of an enormous skills shortage. Now we're also in a demographic crunch at the moment with large numbers of boomers going into retirement and fewer numbers of millennials replacing them, so unless that picture changes significantly, either by raising the retirement age/encouraging older people to work for longer or increasing the birth rate (which obviously won't have an impact for some time), the only option is increasing immigration, which is something the government has backed itself into a corner about.
So we're likely to scrabble along in low productivity mode for a generation unless something noticeably changes. As a point of reference, there are currently around 1.3 million unfilled vacancies in the UK.
To compound the demographic impact, with fewer millennials available to replace retirees, there is a shortfall in funding for their pensions.Now we're also in a demographic crunch at the moment with large numbers of boomers going into retirement and fewer numbers of millennials replacing them, so unless that picture changes significantly, either by raising the retirement age/encouraging older people to work for longer or increasing the birth rate (which obviously won't have an impact for some time), the only option is increasing immigration, which is something the government has backed itself into a corner about.
Indeed. I was reading a book (like an entire book) on the subject before I got Covid and while it was solely looking at the US, they have built up a bit of a reserve to help them when income from taxes doesn't cover pension payments, but unless things change (ie higher taxes, later retirement, lower pension payments etc.) then that fund will be gone in around 10-15 years. As is common I suspect everywhere, politicians much prefer to kick this can down the road to the next lot until the wolf is at the door and then scrabble together a last minute fix.To compound the demographic impact, with fewer millennials available to replace retirees, there is a shortfall in funding for their pensions.
Conclusion
If the next generation is smaller in number than the current generation, the current generation has to:
accept a cut in its real pensions or
contribute more whilst in work or
increase productivity,
work longer and retire later, or
accept more immigration
Loading…
www.actuaries.org.uk

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.