Current Affairs The Conservative Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
summerisle said:
World beating.

FRM-x12WQAITAtZ
Click to expand...

Well Pete did say Johnson was like Churchill, maybe he had something there.. :)
 
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...

Mate Johnson is all soundbite and no substance at all, at least you can understand Starmer, whether hes boring or not, Johnson is practically unintelligible. As for authentic, cmon seriously who believes a word he says.
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...
Eeesh, I would say that Corbyn had authenticity, don’t read The Telegraph but would guess they weren’t particularly complimentary of him.
I kinda agree that people have no idea what kind of person Starmer even is but if that means people vote for the big bumbling liar opposite then they’re just looking for an excuse to vote Tory. As is always the way.
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...
A bloke born in New York, raised in Brussels, and schooled at Eton has about as much in common with the ordinary voter as Al Murray does with Al Murray. It's an act Pete and I'm amazed you aren't aware of that. Even his support for Brexit is an act because it was the quickest path to power.
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...
Man of the people is De Piffle.

1708.jpg
 
summerisle said:
Click to expand...


It kinda annoys me, cos I have been a TS listener for ages. And I quite like their content and general feel as a broadcaster. But now they are endlessly pushing this new link to their owners stable, I feel conflicted. I guess if I continue to listen, but dont buy a Wickes screwdriver nor one of their TS mugs, I should be comfortable with that.
 
Bruce Wayne said:
A bloke born in New York, raised in Brussels, and schooled at Eton has about as much in common with the ordinary voter as Al Murray does with Al Murray. It's an act Pete and I'm amazed you aren't aware of that. Even his support for Brexit is an act because it was the quickest path to power.
Click to expand...

Of course it’s an act, it’s the same one as performed by Blair and also by Starmer…..
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...
What a load of bollox…
 
peteblue said:
Part of an article from the Telegraph…..discussing Starmer, but as he’s too boring I’ve pulled out the good bit….

”Both Nandy and Rayner have that priceless political characteristic: authenticity. They sound like they mean what they say, because they say it in normal voices, the kind of voices ordinary voters can relate to. Starmer, perhaps because of a career spent in the austere and formal environment of the courtroom, has yet to display that crucial ability of sounding as if he’s not reading from a script.

Labour MPs and activists have spent so much time hating Boris Johnston (for Brexit, not Partygate) and talking among themselves about how awful he is that they have lost sight of the reason he remains a potent political force: like Nandy and Rayner – perhaps even more so – Johnson is authentic (or appears to be, which is the next best thing). He doesn’t look or sound like the boring, predictable politicians we have got used to seeing on our TV screens since spin doctors on both sides started programming, grooming and training their clients.

Having spent so long indulging their six-year hate of Johnson, Labour have had little time to consider the reasons behind his electability, which is why they have made so little progress against him. Partygate, as Nandy has spotted, now presents limited returns for Labour. It risks being seen as a party talking only to itself and the converted, not to those who might well still support the Conservatives, even under Johnson.”…….
Click to expand...
Ahh still waving the Johnson flag.

In none of these posts about him, so you see him as a corrupt, serial lying narcissist, which is how the majority of people now see him, apart from his staunch cult followers like yourself.

It took a while, but the country I believe has finally woken up to him.

We don’t need a clown or second rate journalist as PM, we need a politician, or at least somebody who doesn’t have to lie to the HOC every time he takes the floor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top