Chewbacca
Player Valuation: £35m
Who did that personalised BMW belong to.......
Almost certainly a drug dealer in that neck of the woods
Who did that personalised BMW belong to.......
Who did that personalised BMW belong to.......
Who did that personalised BMW belong to.......
Who did that personalised BMW belong to.......
Like A daily mail headline writer you Spotted the big story there pete.
S30 NDR
Good mate of mine.
On tonight 9.45 BBC2
I've mentioned it in a few other threads, but what is the answer? All politicians seem to have tried to date when jobs have been lost is to try and get the same jobs back, which seems unlikely, or to consign those who lost their jobs to a lifetime of welfare. What have 30-40 years of governments (and indeed wider society) both in the UK and most other developed countries done wrong? The situation seems to say that people, and therefore whole regions, cannot do different things, so if one livelihood goes then you're up the creek. That's a pretty depressing state of play.
One way would be to do what some nations do (including the ERGs new favourite, Singapore) and look to provide things that the state can do cheaply (housing, transport etc). That might allow firms to lower wages whilst not driving millions into poverty /debt because they can’t pay living costs.
Are there any examples of governments doing that and an area being transformed long-term? Could be anywhere in the world. Genuinely interested.
As a deliberate act of policy (ie: to cut the cost of living allowing wages to fall)? Not sure, though to mention Singapore again they have 82-85% of the population in social housing and three million journeys made their integrated (privately owned but fares are regulated) public transport system most days (the population is five million), and they seem to be doing ok.
I just think that is a better way of dealing with changes in employment practice, or certainly better than telling people how lazy they are, blaming migrants and offering them credit at upwards of 40% apr is.
I quite agree. It's a simplification obviously, but it seems like the Tory position to this has broadly been that change is inevitable, but you're on your own in terms of adapting to it, so we'll stick you on quasi-permanent welfare to keep the peace. The Labour position has been to rose-tint the (male) jobs down a pit or in a steel works (other jobs apply), and that these jobs have to be maintained at all costs.
No one has really taken the stance that change is inevitable, but that we (society) will do all we can to help people adapt to that change.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.