Well, better than the Ukrainians anyway.What utter bollocks, on so many levels.
news.northwestern.edu
The damage they have done with a false narrative of representing both sides is colossalIt's perhaps not "that" surprising, but still, maybe now the media will stop doing it?
False balance in news coverage of climate change makes it harder to address the crisis
Bothsidesism — also referred to as false balance reporting — can damage the public’s ability to distinguish fact from fiction and lead audiences to doubt the scientific consensus on pressing societal challenges like climate change, a new Northwestern University study has found.
The BBC are terrible for this. Radio call ins where callers were allowed to repeat false narratives unchecked cos presenters were too afraid to be accused of bias.It's perhaps not "that" surprising, but still, maybe now the media will stop doing it?
False balance in news coverage of climate change makes it harder to address the crisis
Bothsidesism — also referred to as false balance reporting — can damage the public’s ability to distinguish fact from fiction and lead audiences to doubt the scientific consensus on pressing societal challenges like climate change, a new Northwestern University study has found.
The airtime they gave to farage running up to brexit was a disgrace
Indeed. Always thought they gave a platform to the far right as a way of saying ‘look we are non biased’ but you would rarely see or hear anything far left and it would usually be slapped down as being naive.
Lying by omission is the BBCs speciality.
