It's a football team, who cares how much they're worth. Apart from City, Chelsea, Utd and the rs everyone else is pretty much, much of a muchness.
Interestong - but this is stats based on branding (we've been weak at that for eons admittedly) and subsequent subscriptions from around the world. Might be skewed by being the sort of people who like the colour of a kit or the location (London - only town in the UK when viewed from the US, other than its suburb Manchester). Also more affluent London ers are more likely to have more spare cash to throw money at club subscriptions. Doesn't necessarily relate to size of fan base.
Nonsense
Anything is worth what someone will pay for it and I promise you nobody will ever pay more for Brighton than Everton - even if they have recently turned good profits by buying and selling smartly (I can only assume that’s where they’ve got their overinflated number from)
Then look at West Ham. Traditionally a yo yo club. Negative
Waste loads of money and find themselves wrong end of the table. Negative
Don’t own a ground. Negative
Have an aging poorly performing squad. Negative
But erm they’re in London so put them in seventh![]()
Interestong - but this is stats based on branding (we've been weak at that for eons admittedly) and subsequent subscriptions from around the world. Might be skewed by being the sort of people who like the colour of a kit or the location (London - only town in the UK when viewed from the US, other than its suburb Manchester). Also more affluent London ers are more likely to have more spare cash to throw money at club subscriptions. Doesn't necessarily relate to size of fan base.
Let's see again in a few seasons then.No, that's the amount of people who follow the clubs on social media not subscriptions.
Leicester have 10 million more followers more than us and they are not in London.
Let's see again in a few seasons then.
I'm always puzzled by stadium valuations. If we tried to sell it as a standalone who would actually want to buy it?The stadium alone is worth over £800 million. Ridiculous “valuation”
I subscribed at the start to check it out…dropped it at the first opportunity. Sanitised regurgitation of already available insights does not justify a sub. Proof that I’m happy with that call is the reality that I can’t remember the last time I bothered to use a paywall ladder to read one of their articles…The Athletic used to be the future of sports media.
Its now just junk like the rest. Generic waffle
I'm always puzzled by stadium valuations. If we tried to sell it as a standalone who would actually want to buy it?
Bit surprised by the Villa one tbh. Championship club until fairly recent, not won anything, not obvious connection to a city (for foreign followers) so must be domestic for the most part (if those numbers can be believed).
So they shouldn't report this because we happened to get a new owner? Has it occured that they have other readers besides Evertonians?Someone said earlier in the thread it’s based off the 23/24 seasons. I understand the financial reporting lag which would help it report but 1) why report on this at all and 2) if you have to report it, the timing is off (particularly in our cases with the new stadium)
I would imagine when they report this again in future (as useless as the information is) we would be close to or above billion mark with the addition of the stadium value to t(e balance sheet and the increased revenue (and costs) to the P&L.
But ultimately reporting this piece of information is pretty pointless imo.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.