Current Affairs The " another shooting in America " thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 28206
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I find the Vegas shooting and aftermath absolutely bizarre. I'm not a conspiracy guy, but if I were, it'd be high on the list (although I don't have any particular leaning about who or what would be involved). That said, I don't know who Loomer is or what she's trying to claim here.
Pettifogger. . Serious question.. do you own a gun .. or possibly more than one.

If so..then why ?

And lastly. . What would it take for you to give them up ?
 
Pettifogger. . Serious question.. do you own a gun .. or possibly more than one.

If so..then why ?

And lastly. . What would it take for you to give them up ?

Generally, I imagine one owns guns for a mixture of personal protection, the enjoyment of being proficient at something, and the enjoyment of owning a finely crafted tool. Hunting is also a common reason, of course.

It's difficult for me to say why an owner would give them up, perhaps some insecurity about their ability to handle them safely, or just a general declining interest/need for money/etc. If you're asking what kind of deal would have to be struck for some governmental gun ban or confiscation, it's almost too remote to speculate about. Theoretically, I'm personally probably more concerned about the change in society/government that makes gun confiscation possible more so than I am the absence of the guns themselves.
 
"Says the guy who supports the organization..."

You failed from the outset. I'll admit, what you lack in the substantive ability to argue your firmly-held belief, you make up for with amusing, if quite repetitive, quips.

Heya Fogger. 'Supports their position' would have been more accurate. Fair enough.

Sorry I have only had an opportunity to peek in at the odd moment today. Too busy doing my lefty, left winging today to respond.

I just can't accept the tiny crack in the dam argument as reality. It is fear based. It's a reality not based in facts, but in a fear of the worst possible scenario.

Now, perhaps a small section on the side of control share the equal and opposite view, that it's total banishment or bust, but that would be an extreme minority.

The problem from where I sit is that the pro gun folks have been so convinced by the NRA lobby and the politicians that support their investment, that their extreme view is the vast majority.

There are sensible solutions. The fear of the total failure bogeyman is a tale told by the gun lobby. I bet someone at Colt started it.
 
Pettifogger. . Serious question.. do you own a gun .. or possibly more than one.

If so..then why ?

And lastly. . What would it take for you to give them up ?

I would put money on 15+ guns under his roof. Wide ranging calibers. An antique or two in there. A gun safe for storage, but probably at least one or two at the ready in a nightstand or another inconspicuous place in the kitchen or the living room or all of the above.

Probably some accessories too like sites and stuff but I doubt big magazines. Maybe a one off for show.
 
Come on. Small penises are the overwhelming reason for gun ownership.

Living in Europe with tighter gun laws, small penis packing men have to buy Porsche Cayennes (or 7 litre V8 monstrosities)
 
Heya Fogger. 'Supports their position' would have been more accurate. Fair enough.

Sorry I have only had an opportunity to peek in at the odd moment today. Too busy doing my lefty, left winging today to respond.

I just can't accept the tiny crack in the dam argument as reality. It is fear based. It's a reality not based in facts, but in a fear of the worst possible scenario.

Now, perhaps a small section on the side of control share the equal and opposite view, that it's total banishment or bust, but that would be an extreme minority.

The problem from where I sit is that the pro gun folks have been so convinced by the NRA lobby and the politicians that support their investment, that their extreme view is the vast majority.

There are sensible solutions. The fear of the total failure bogeyman is a tale told by the gun lobby. I bet someone at Colt started it.

My opinions have remained pretty constant, I think. In short, gun control measures advertised as "common sense" probably won't make any considerable difference. Rather, larger bans (be it just certain types or broader swaths, like handguns) and confiscations would probably be necessary to satisfy the country's appetite for serious violence reduction. So, my first goal would be to talk about what'll work vs. what won't work.

Beyond that, I don't think confiscations are coming soon. That said, there is a considerable contingent on the left saying things like "go get the assault weapons" "nobody should be able to own any gun, but certainly not an AR-15." In other words, I don't "feel" whatever fear you might say the NRA touts. But do I think there is a considerable element of the American left that wants to remove some/all guns individual owners (setting aside mental health and the like) - yes, I do. Because there is.

More practically, with regard to the crack in the dam issue, the crack will certainly grow. Small restrictions won't work, leading to bigger restrictions. The NRA's idea that once society begins to cave on 2A encroachment, additional restrictions will come easier is sound IMO. I'm hopeful you'll understand the distinction I'm drawing between my belief in the practical inevitability of this likely outcome, and a more grandiose slippery slope fear that sees Hillary's goons tearing up my house by year's end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top