The 2015 Popularity Contest (aka UK General Election )

Who will you be voting for?

  • Tory

    Votes: 38 9.9%
  • Diet Tory (Labour)

    Votes: 132 34.3%
  • Tory Zero (Greens)

    Votes: 44 11.4%
  • Extra Tory with lemon (UKIP)

    Votes: 40 10.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 9 2.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 31 8.1%
  • Cheese on toast

    Votes: 91 23.6%

  • Total voters
    385
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hahahaha....he's the Deputy PM......it's like Two Jags distancing himself from Labour.......

He went straight for Cameron in the recent debate to, may be a desperate ploy but he is a pretty desperate man at the moment.

Plenty of differences from Prezza, seperate party from the PM being the main one. Clegg could potentially could put Cameron back in number 10.
 
So why does Manchester get the investment ? Similar Labour controlled council........

The post bomb investment kick started the local economy and they've built on it. As horrible as it was at the time it has been the making of modern day Manchester.

The government offered several different grants for large & small businesses to start up or continue in the Manchester area (The big fear at the time was businesses relocating out of fear for a second attack). Since then they've flourished going from strength to strength, this in turn has attracted others to the area and so the cycle goes on. Fair play to them for having the forward vision.

Not suggesting we haven't seen investment recently here however it's largely been in projects such as L1 and the arena. Yes this does create jobs but not the mid to high skill ranged ones which pay decent wages and encourge upwards social mobility.

Of course they also have a world class airport and geographically are favourably positioned which are big factors as well.
 
Erm...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...tle-jailed-for-grooming-children-9883013.html

You've had a 'mare today - exposed yourself as a fool I'm afraid.

A former UKIP chairman is jailed for grooming children and that means Labour isn't a party of paedophiles? My oh my.

You're right, it isn't difficult to get, I just think it's just such a ridiculous logic that I had to contemplate the possibility (or hope) that you might've been joking.

Lest we forget, UKIP are the party who have had no end of scandal for blatant racism. Their representatives (or those not already expelled for racism) live in the dark ages. Remember Godfrey bloom with bongo bongo land? James Smith saying Pakistan nationals wear pyjamas? There are countless more instances. Not to mention, UKIP have extreme racist fascist allies in Europe... But you prefer to ignore this point whenever I raise it, so no doubt you will do again now.

But wait, UKIP are 'nationalist for the UK', not just a country, so they're alright aren't they? They're not half as bad as that vile SNP who, despite not having such bigotry in their ranks, have dared dream of self-governance. How dare they, the fascists!



You're nothing if not controversial. But then, you're in good company supporting UKIP mate.

You'll probably deny that you support them but I think we all know on here that you're a fan. Your relentless defending of them, making out that poor Mr Farage is the most hard done by man in Britain, etc, demonstrates this.

And to think, you, of all people, have the nerve to point your finger at other people on here and accuse them of being closet racists.

Don't support any party, haven't voted for a while. Wouldn't hide it if I did support UKIP, your implications that supporting them has so many negative connotations is literally fascist.

Didn't say UKIP weren't racist (read my posts properly please).

On one hand you refer to UKIP as a racist party:





Then you come out with stuff like this:



So where do you stand? Are they racist or not? Nationalist or not? You clearly support them, so enlighten me.

I don't support any party matey.

Erm, mods??

Mods are welcome to add input if they wish.

If you're imply that they need to take action due to my having a different opinion, that's fascist.

And yet Farage is the most discriminated against person at the moment ? Give up mate.

Easily.
 
I want to pay more tax. The argument that paying less tax makes you better off assumes you live in a vacuum and that public services don't improve society. Sniff it fascists.

I don't think anyone minds paying taxes - but it has to be fair taxing.

Lowering the top rate of tax whilst decimating benefits and doing next to nothing for the middle classes is not fair; it's prioritising the very top exclusively.
 
2. Labour is a party of paedophiles. Saddens me that people support them.

Just so you are absolutely clear where I am coming from I have been a member of the Labour Party since 1984.

Just as in every area of society I am sure there have been, are and will be paedophiles within the party, no more or less than any other political party.

You are completely wrong with your statement that the LP is "a party of paedophiles"

If you are referring to the allegations regarding PIE and NCCL then I suggest you read the various statements made by Harman and Dromey and consider your statement in the light of those statements.

Perhaps you will have the decency then to withdraw the remark.
 
....I do think a couple of revelations from Liberal Ministers might be against Collective Cabinet Office responsibility but are worthy of note. A few months ago Clegg said he was in no doubt the Tory austerity was a cover for their 'small government' ideology. This week Danny Alexander revealed a senior Tory said 'we will look after the bosses, you look after the workers'.

Significant statements and I can imagine both of those Ministers didn't argue too much at the time. I might be wrong but I get the feel that Alexander was a godsend to the Chancellor, like a nodding donkey at Budget time but now spilling the beans when his career is in doubt. I wouldn't lose any sleep if he lost his seat.
 
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/03/why-are-so-many-people-using-food-banks


Parsons Green is a quiet, affluent neighbourhood of west London. The streets surrounding the green are lined with smart delis, boutiques and champagne bars, and the well-off regulars at the White Horse pub on the corner have earned it the nickname the “Sloaney Pony”. The red-brick terraces of the nearby Peterborough estate sell for £3m or more. Tucked between two of these multimillion-pound homes is ChristChurch Fulham, an Anglican church that since 2010 has housed the local food bank.

Between April 2014 and January this year, Hammersmith and Fulham Foodbank handed out more than 3,000 free food parcels. Most of its clients have travelled in from more deprived corners of west London or further afield, but once or twice residents of the Peterborough estate have been forced, by an unexpected job loss and huge debts, to come here for help, too.

“Most people are only a pay cheque away from a crisis,” said Daphine Aikens, the food bank’s founder. We spoke last summer in the short lulls between new arrivals. Every now and then she jumped up from her chair to clear away plastic tea and coffee cups and cake plates, or to make sure the leaflets from local charities were arranged just so on each table. It was an unexpectedly quiet morning, she said, but still a steady stream of people turned up. A mother-of-three who had fled an abusive relationship; an old man; a young couple; a skinny teenager in an oversized hoodie; a single mother with learning difficulties and her ten-year-old son, who translated for her; an Eritrean asylum-seeker whose claim had been rejected, and who wasn’t eligible for a parcel but had nowhere else to go. “I really can’t help you again,” the volunteer said, searching the woman’s face for a sign of understanding.

Aikens used to focus on giving to international NGOs, until she discovered how many people were going hungry closer to home. When she brought up the subject at church a member of the congregation directed her to the Trussell Trust, a charity that runs the UK’s largest network of food banks. Aikens says her work is inspired by her Christianity. “Part of our faith is that we want to serve and to love, and believe people are of value,” she explained. “Lots of people haven’t ever been told they’re of value. Here we can tell people they’re of value, that they deserve the food.”

The Trussell Trust operates as a “social franchise”, which means that each food bank is run as an independent charity but the central organisation provides training, guidelines and logistical support. The details vary from town to town but the overall set-up is the same. Doctors, social workers, the police and various charities hand out vouchers to people in crisis. With this voucher, they can then collect three days’ worth of food from their local food bank. Food banks were designed as an emergency stopgap: the aim is that people should collect no more than three parcels, by which point they should, in theory, have found a more sustainable solution.

The trust was founded in 1997 by two former UN workers, Paddy and Carol Henderson, and was originally conceived to support street children in Bulgaria. Then, in 2000, Paddy received a call from a mother in Salisbury whose children were going hungry. Her story inspired him to open his first food bank in the city, which he ran from home. In 2004, he decided to expand the model. “The simple phrase that stuck with us was that ‘if Salisbury needs a food bank, every town should have one’,” says Chris Mould, chairman of the Trussell Trust, who has worked with the organisation since 2003.

In recent years both the number of food banks and the numbers of people who use them have risen exponentially. Between April 2008 and March 2009 Trussell Trust food banks handed out 25,899 parcels. In the corresponding period in 2010-11, covering the time of the last general election, it gave out 128,697. By last financial year (2013-14), that figure had grown nearly eightfold to almost a million parcels. This year the figure is likely to be higher still: 492,741 parcels were given out between April and September 2014, an increase of 38 per cent over the same period in 2013.

This is not the full picture. The Trussell Trust’s 430 or so food banks are believed to account for roughly half the country’s network, but there is no complete database of the charities giving out emergency food aid. The lack of data is partly due to the government’s apparent lack of curiosity about how many people are falling through its welfare net. “The government does not monitor the use of food banks and has no plans to do so,” the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed in response to a Freedom of Information request in December 2013. In March, the department confirmed that this remains its position.

(Article continues...)
 
Not a UKIP supporter, but why does everyone think they are racist? From my perspective it looks like they are pushing for an Australian style of Government. Also the 'health tourism' point that Farage made was a very good point, 60% of our HIV patients are foreigners (statistic could be wrong, but it's what I read). In America you wouldn't even be allowed in their country with HIV.

I don't think I'll vote at this election. I lean more left, but I'm not feeling it towards Ed Milliband (the happy warrior lol).
 
Not a UKIP supporter, but why does everyone think they are racist? From my perspective it looks like they are pushing for an Australian style of Government. Also the 'health tourism' point that Farage made was a very good point, 60% of our HIV patients are foreigners (statistic could be wrong, but it's what I read). In America you wouldn't even be allowed in their country with HIV.

I don't think I'll vote at this election. I lean more left, but I'm not feeling it towards Ed Milliband (the happy warrior lol).

https://aliberallife.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/farage-and-the-hiv-lie/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top