Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
Celtic 8th, Rangers 17th, interesting........
Rangers have won the most league title throughtout all the leagues in the world I believe...
Celtic 8th, Rangers 17th, interesting........
These lists are silly because everyone uses different factors to judge how big a team is depending on the club they support.
For some total trophy count will be the sole defining reason, typically fans from historically big clubs like Everton etc will use this as the definition for bigness as it allows us into the conversation despite the fact we haven’t won anything for twenty odd years. The fact is though that there is an entire generation now who view us as complete no marks who are here just to make up the numbers... so long as never win anything in younger generations lifetimes we will continue to be viewed this way.
Youll then have other clubs who have no history of winning trophies who think they should be in there purely because they have fantastic attendance... see Newcastle. This is delusional.
Ultimately for me it has to be a combination of total trophies, recent history of success, current attendance and worldwide fanbase. With those things in mind I think we place about 7th.
There is no way in hell we’re bigger than Chelsea nowadays. They have been near top of English footy for the past ten or so years and have developed a significant worldwide fanbase.
City are a bit different. Historically they are not a big club, same goes for Chelsea but they are winning trophies now at a time when the sport and premier league is bigger than ever. They will grow massively as a club over the next decade or so and most likely end up on similar level to Chelsea in terms of popularity.
Spurs I kind of view the same as us, good history of winning trophies but not enough success in modern times. They do have a bigger fanbase though but that’s to be expected given the size of London. Sure they haven’t won the league as much as us but they’ve won lots of FA Cups back when that was considered a very big deal.
I think 6th/7th is fair enough.
That list however is a total joke (which is no surprise as its form talksh##e). For example, i can understand why they'd have Chelsea and Man City higher up then us since they've been winning titles and cups in recent years but Spurs?! Remained me what they've won in that time?
Leeds United (a club I proper hate) is apparently lower then West Brom, Southampton and Stoke?! Just LOL at that B.S. there's also the likes of Sheffield Wednesday who are missing that are much bigger then Stoke and West Brom could ever hope to be on any level.
A bigger draw certainly, bigger club? Nah, they're gonna have to win at least a few cups and league before they can boast that. Chelsea and Man City I can understand but with Spurs the media have always portraid them as bigger then they actually are.Spurs have a bigger overall fanbase than us and a very similar amount of major trophies and have actually won a trophy in the past ten years. They have also had a lot more big name players play for them over the years. I’d also argue in terms of local fanbase they are the biggest club in London even ahead of Arsenal. Combine this with the fact they have had three or so seasons of champs league football in the past decade which only increases exposure. Most people definitely consider them to be bigger than us I’m afraid.
Leeds still have a larger fan base then West Brom, Stoke and Southampton despite ears in the wilderness. I seriously doubt that the vast majority of people who watch the premier league around the world do so to see those clubs and will no doubt simply remembered them as the side Man Utd or Chelsea or whoever beat that week. They can have all the exposure they want but the reality is Leeds are still more know to this day by causal fans for their run in the 2000 champions league then any of those clubs could ever hope to be.As I said in my previous post that is logical, they are now bigger clubs because they have been competing in the league during its largest ever period of growth. There will be millions worldwide who have never even heard of Leeds whereas every week there are matches televised to every corner of the globe involving Stoke, West Brom and Southampton on the TV.
This league is bigger than England now, it’s a global phenomenon and Leeds have missed out on its most important years.
Rangers have won the most league title throughtout all the leagues in the world I believe...
Leeds still have a larger fan base then West Brom, Stoke and Southampton despite ears in the wilderness..
I seriously doubt that the vast majority of people who watch the premier league around the world do so to see those clubs and will no doubt simply remembered them as the side Man Utd or Chelsea or whoever beat that week. They can have all the exposure they want but the reality is Leeds are still more know to this day by causal fans for their run in the 2000 champions league then any of those clubs could ever hope to be.
To be honest I am surprised we are ahead of both of them, thought both would have been put in the top 8 and us behind them. Not that I think they are bigger or better than us just that others may see it that way.Celtic 8th, Rangers 17th, interesting........
7th eh?https://talksport.com/football/top-...ber-one-ranked-2017-edition-171207264732?p=26
They have us at 7th....
Being honest, we've won more league trophies than City and Spurs put together.
I'd definately have us above those two.... arguably Chelsea too.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.