So, we actually didn’t have anyone that could of done what he did. We sent them to a club we thought befitting of their level. It seems to be the cycle we have of sending lads to jarg teams and wondering why they don’t come back brilliant. That’s part of the process that needs to change.
No, you need to keep up and remember what point you're trying to make.
You were saying the academy is not functional as it hasn't produced players who could fill in at left back like Martina did, but it has. It's produced a Youth World Cup winner and an American international, but the manager of our first team took a risk and decided those players would benefit more from prolonged exposure at a good level on the basis that they would get limited time on the pitch for us. As it happened, Baines got a bad injury and they would have had more games than we originally thought, but I wouldn't necessarily say it was the wrong decision to loan them. Either way, you can't use it as an example of the academy not functioning if you want to be taken seriously.
Personally I think you're showing a misunderstanding of the cultural differences between football in England (and the PL in particular) and in Europe. The fact that England has 100+ fully professional clubs makes it a totally different proposition to the likes of Germany, which has only around half of that, spread over a far greater area. It's not easy for a club like us to bring through huge amounts of fantastic players because we're competing with around 20 other clubs in the local area for young lads. Then when you do get close to the first team, the quality of player in front of you, and the money at stake in the league, makes it more difficult to break through. Just look at the amount of players Chelsea send to Holland for evidence of how much easier it is to break into a side in those leagues in comparison to a PL team. If we were playing in a league of that standard, the likes of Forshaw, Duffy, Bidwell etc would probably all have played 100 games for us, and Pennington, Browning etc would be very much in our first team plans. At a higher level though, we've decided they don't quite make the grade, although a number of them have still managed to play their fair share of games at this level.
In short, our academy is of course not perfect, and like everything else we should look to improve it as much as we can, but to suggest that it's not functional or fit for purpose is just demonstrably false.