Current Affairs Stabbing incident in Southport

[neil999]

Diagnosed autistic, obsession with death...Islam seems to have little to do with it, seems similar to sandy hook

 

[barneygumble]

Diagnosed autistic, obsession with death...Islam seems to have little to do with it, seems similar to sandy hook

Clearly has some mental deficiencies, but so do many people.

What made this kid evil?

The one thing that terrifies me, as a parent is, he could just download Al-Qaeda manuals?

The Internet is bloody scary.

 

[neil999]

Clearly has some mental deficiencies, but so do many people.

What made this kid evil?

The one thing that terrifies me, as a parent is, he could just download Al-Qaeda manuals?

The Internet is bloody scary.

I think the only answer to this is some people are born with this evil in them

 

[Dymak]

Minging little rat! We should not be spending money keeping him alive, we should just shoot him in the head (if you want to be humane) and have done with it.

Can’t be arsed arguing the toss, and people have a right to their own opinions, but I think people hide behind the notion that discussing a terror attack could jeopardise a court hearing, similar to how some people hide behind GDPR and ‘data protection’ when it comes to sharing information.

They act like you aren’t allowed to share any information full stop when that’s really not the case; there are loads of circumstances in which data protection NEEDS to be ignored!

They also eventually released the information of him possessing an Islamic terror handbook etc well ahead of the scheduled trial, but long after the terror attack.

They did this because reporting what he has been charged with would have absolutely no chance of destabilising a trial. So I’m wondering what information they reckon actually needed to be withheld, when it was inevitably disclosed well ahead of the trial anyway?

 

[slipstream86]

So how are we going to control all of these knives bought on Amazon with lethal potential then if (according to the gov) that's part of a response to reduce the likelihood of this happening again?

Anyone with under 18yo children living with them in their house have any kitchen knives?

 

[neil999]

Minging little rat! We should not be spending money keeping him alive, we should just shoot him in the head (if you want to be humane) and have done with it.

Can’t be arsed arguing the toss, and people have a right to their own opinions, but I think people hide behind the notion that discussing a terror attack could jeopardise a court hearing, similar to how some people hide behind GDPR and ‘data protection’ when it comes to sharing information. They act like you aren’t allowed to share any information full stop when that’s really not the case; there are loads of circumstances in which data protection NEEDS to be ignored!

They also eventually released the information of him possessing an Islamic terror handbook etc well ahead of the scheduled trial, but long after the terror attack.

They did this because reporting what he has been charged with would have absolutely no chance of destabilising a trial. So I’m wondering what information they reckon actually needed to be withheld, when it was inevitably disclosed well ahead of the trial anyway?

The head of the CPS thought it could jeopardise the trial, do you think the prime minister should have overruled the CPS

 

[trueblue84]

Got to say, the media reveling in this case is sickening. It doesn't need wall to wall coverage with the reporters feigning emotion and fighting back tears.

He's a sick person who committed a heinous crime. He will be sentenced and that should be the end of it, unless the government holds an enquiry. It doesn't need editorialising from the media.

 

[Dymak]

The head of the CPS thought it could jeopardise the trial, do you think the prime minister should have overruled the CPS

They disclosed the information well ahead of the scheduled trial anyway, with the disclosures coming several months later, on the same day as the budget.

Criminal court hearings have been a matter of public record for a very long time. It’s nonsense to suggest that reporting on a person being charged with a crime could destabilise a court hearing.

 

[neil999]

They disclosed the information well ahead of the scheduled trial anyway, with the disclosures coming several months later on the same day as the budget.

Criminal court hearings have been a matter of public record for a very long time. It’s nonsense to suggest that reporting on a person being charged with a crime could destabilise a court hearing.

I guess the cps have no idea then and you know better...WHY did the public need to know the details before the trial?

 

[Dymak]

I guess the cps have no idea then and you know better...WHY did the public need to know the details before the trial?

This would be the same CPS that went ahead and disclosed the information in question ahead of the trial anyway?

It’s a matter of public record.

 

[neil999]

This would be the same CPS that went ahead and disclosed the information in question ahead of the trial anyway?

It’s a matter of public record.

Again why did the public need to know?

 

[Dymak]

Again why did the public need to know?

Because criminal court cases in the UK are a matter of public record, as they should be.

 

[gianthogweed]

Again why did the public need to know?

Yeah keep the sheep in the pen hey

 

[neil999]

Because criminal court cases in the UK are a matter of public record, as they should be.

Oh dear

 

[neil999]

Yeah keep the sheep in the pen hey

Clueless