Sportpesa

[ForeverBlue92]

Manchester United (Chevrolet)	64
Manchester City (Etihad)	45
Chelsea FC (Yokohama)	40
Liverpool FC (Standard Chartered)	40
Arsenal FC (Fly Emirates)	40
Tottenham Hotspur (AIA)	35
West Ham United (Betway)	10
Everton FC (SportPesa)	9.6
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (ManBetX)	8
Southampton FC (LD Sports)	7.5
Burnley (LoveBet)	7.5
Crystal Palace (ManBetX)	6.5
Newcastle United (Fun88)	6.5
Watford (Sportsbet.io)	6.5
Aston Villa (W88)	6
AFC Bournemouth (M88)	5
Leicester City (King Power)	4
Sheffield United (USG)	3.5
Norwich City (Dafabet)	3
Brighton (American Express)	1.

Looking at the above table - USM sponsering us for say £15-20 million wouldnt be enough for the authorities to look into us neither would it bridge the gap massively between us and the top 6 but it would certainly create a gap between us and the rest of the league which needs to be the aim.

Add in the future naming rights deal for BMD at say £20-25 million a year which the teams outside the top 6 wont have - the aim has to be making us into a top 7 where financially we are not as powerful as the 6 cartel but much stronger than the rest of the league and hopefully a few seasons in europe / odd CL qualification hopefully would see us slowly bridge the gap with the big 6 in which USM can slowly increase sponserships over time to reflect our growth on the pitch.

 

[BigDunc1985]

How beaten down are our fans that we're desperately hoping USM to "slowly increase sponsorships over time".

How about we take Usmanov's dirty money now, and then legitimately attract real sponsorships overtime and that means we can get away from him before he gets his assets seized or dies of a massive heart attack?

 

[sfa.ok]

 

[Toffeelover]

Any rumour or hint on who will be the new shirt sponsor? Do not think if it was Megafon that would upset UEFA.

 

[AmericasToffee]

Good riddance

 

[little elfin]

 

[Nymzee]

No penalty for breaking the contract early apparently

which means it was a terrible contract in the first place

Or we were just smart with it as a filler sponsor.

 

[Toffeelover]

Or we were just smart with it as a filler sponsor.

I think there is a pay off settlement.

 

[Oasis1878]

Any rumour or hint on who will be the new shirt sponsor? Do not think if it was Megafon that would upset UEFA.

NEC apparently. Rumours Angry Birds is going too

 

[GwladysPhil]

Manchester United (Chevrolet)	64
Manchester City (Etihad)	45
Chelsea FC (Yokohama)	40
Liverpool FC (Standard Chartered)	40
Arsenal FC (Fly Emirates)	40
Tottenham Hotspur (AIA)	35
West Ham United (Betway)	10
Everton FC (SportPesa)	9.6
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (ManBetX)	8
Southampton FC (LD Sports)	7.5
Burnley (LoveBet)	7.5
Crystal Palace (ManBetX)	6.5
Newcastle United (Fun88)	6.5
Watford (Sportsbet.io)	6.5
Aston Villa (W88)	6
AFC Bournemouth (M88)	5
Leicester City (King Power)	4
Sheffield United (USG)	3.5
Norwich City (Dafabet)	3
Brighton (American Express)	1.

Looking at the above table - USM sponsering us for say £15-20 million wouldnt be enough for the authorities to look into us neither would it bridge the gap massively between us and the top 6 but it would certainly create a gap between us and the rest of the league which needs to be the aim.

Add in the future naming rights deal for BMD at say £20-25 million a year which the teams outside the top 6 wont have - the aim has to be making us into a top 7 where financially we are not as powerful as the 6 cartel but much stronger than the rest of the league and hopefully a few seasons in europe / odd CL qualification hopefully would see us slowly bridge the gap with the big 6 in which USM can slowly increase sponserships over time to reflect our growth on the pitch.

Wait for planning permission and finance to be approved for BMD and then we can justify the inflated sponsorship valuation, we could push for £30m.

If the sponsor is Usmanov associated or not they could justify the valuation with the world class dock stadium on the horizon ambitious and fighting for Europe etc.

 

[Disgruntledgoat]

Perhaps not so anymore, hopefully lessons have been learned from City.

Lessons like "dont lie to the league about how much the sponsor are paying you then top it up from the owner". Or alternatively, "if you must, dont leave a really obvious audit trail."

 

[Disgruntledgoat]

Manchester United (Chevrolet)	64
Manchester City (Etihad)	45
Chelsea FC (Yokohama)	40
Liverpool FC (Standard Chartered)	40
Arsenal FC (Fly Emirates)	40
Tottenham Hotspur (AIA)	35
West Ham United (Betway)	10
Everton FC (SportPesa)	9.6
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (ManBetX)	8
Southampton FC (LD Sports)	7.5
Burnley (LoveBet)	7.5
Crystal Palace (ManBetX)	6.5
Newcastle United (Fun88)	6.5
Watford (Sportsbet.io)	6.5
Aston Villa (W88)	6
AFC Bournemouth (M88)	5
Leicester City (King Power)	4
Sheffield United (USG)	3.5
Norwich City (Dafabet)	3
Brighton (American Express)	1.

Looking at the above table - USM sponsering us for say £15-20 million wouldnt be enough for the authorities to look into us neither would it bridge the gap massively between us and the top 6 but it would certainly create a gap between us and the rest of the league which needs to be the aim.

Add in the future naming rights deal for BMD at say £20-25 million a year which the teams outside the top 6 wont have - the aim has to be making us into a top 7 where financially we are not as powerful as the 6 cartel but much stronger than the rest of the league and hopefully a few seasons in europe / odd CL qualification hopefully would see us slowly bridge the gap with the big 6 in which USM can slowly increase sponserships over time to reflect our growth on the pitch.

Your City number is wrong... it's actually 8m with the rest coming from their owner, if UEFA are to be believed.

 

[Brisan123]

Tried to get me banned the other night !

You me and a hundred others
it was quite a night

 

[Brisan123]

How about the USM cup. £100m prize money. Us v the Uzbeki farmers.

Probably bottle it and lose

 

[Brisan123]

Uzbeki Farmers 2-1 Everton a last minute mistake from Kane.

We will not be signing Harry Kane