Of course it's opinion but it's based on the facts of what happened at Palace. The point that you and 
@ryanbeno80 we're making is that Unsworth isn't up to the job because he hasn't achieved certain things. I have pointed out that Allardyce didn't achieve those things at Palace over 7 games. Given that Allardyce was the example used to justify the failure to organise defence, defend set pieces etc by Unsworth I'd say my opinion is actually backed up by some facts!
I'm certainly not advocating him being given the job full time at the minute. The fact is that there are not many managers available right now. Like transfers you generally have more chance of getting the best managers in the summer not in November.
So why does he deserve time:
- No manager can turn around a team in 4 games/12 days - see Allardyce at Palace.
 
- He knows the players, particularly the young players
 
- He's improved the spirit and energy of the team. We haven't come from 2-0 down at home for 23 years!
 
- He's a very good coach and a good coach is what we require to get the team organised and playing.
 
- He understands the demands of the club.
 
- He won't stand for any messing about - see Mirallas and Schneiderlin.
 
- We stand a better chance of getting a good manager in the summer.
 
In the circumstances I think he's doing a decent job, you may disagree but I think you're wrong.
		
 
		
	 
 I do think he's doing a decent job. As a caretaker I would expect him to make a few changes, shake things up and get some points on the board. Yesterday was a good result, and he deserves credit for the changes he made and the positivity showed even at 2-2.
To answer your points though:
1. No manager? Really? There are no examples at all of a manager coming in and changing things immediately? Just of the top of my head I can think of Moyes winning his first 2 games with a side that had won 1 in 13 (and scoring 6 goals in those 2 games, the same amount as we had scored in the 13) and Joe Royle going 5 unbeaten and not conceding a goal when taking over a side marooned at the bottom of the league.
2. Yes, that's true. Difficult to say whether it's a good or a bad thing I think, sometimes you may have preconceptions or favourites and a fresh pair of eyes might see things differently.
3. Has he? We've completely folded in 2 of the 4 games he's managed. He also appears to have fallen out with Mirallas, Schneiderlin and Vlasic, and frozen out Sandro and Klaassen. We'll have to wait and see whether spirit has improved I think.
4. I agree it's what we need. I'll be honest and say I don't know how good he is as a coach as I've never seen him take a session or seen players before and after they've worked with him. If you have then fair enough.
5. I'm not really sure that means anything. Does he understand the demands of being a first team manager, the scrutiny, the spotlight, the egos, the booing etc?
6. Again, can be both a good and bad thing. I'm all for discipline but you have to get the balance right. Also worth pointing out the reports suggest it was Ferguson who wouldn't take messing rather than him.
7. Unsubstantiated opinion. Of our last 4 managerial appointments, by far the best was the one made mid-season. Alex Ferguson was appointed mid-season. I honestly can't see the list of candidates being much different in the summer, unless a stand out option resigns or is sacked between now and then.