If the tackle doesn't result in injury then fair enough 3-4 game ban is sufficient but surely the punishment should reflect the damage done?
2 people could drink drive, but should the prison sentence be the same if one knocks down and kills a person? As thats effectively what the current rule is in football which is a joke.
Just dont think a punishment, for anything, should be demanded by the victims of the offence. The rules are there. 2, 4, 5 match ban, whatever, but to say that a player should be banned for a similar time as the player who was crocked is nonsense, in my opinion.
Was a bad tackle, obvs, got a red. Dems the rules.
He would have got a red if Seamus came out of it unhurt. The offence is punished, not the unfortunate out come.
Unpopular maybe, but its the way sport is.