No idea if it’s right, but it would make sense, since everyone - Sky, BBC, even Koeman himself (who presumably would have spoken to BK/FM yesterday?) - seemed to think he would still be in charge for Chelsea and Leicester.
Then suddenly early afternoon Kenwright and Elstone rock up and tell him he’s off.
What changed/happened in those few hours?
....the indication is that there was heated discussion after Sunday’s game involving Moshiri, Kenwright, Walsh and Koeman. If that report is accurate, then Koeman clearly came out of that poorly. Moshiri is a money man and after watching Sunday’s game perhaps there was one key item for discussion - Gylfi Sigurdsson.
The questions would be obvious, not least why spend £45m plus a hefty salary on a player who’s position you had already filled? Why spend £45m plus a hefty salary on a no10 when you had priorities elsewhere? Why was he your no1 target when he looks totally ineffective in the teams you set up?
It would explain why Koeman and Walsh got in a blame game argument. It’s all conjecture, but Sigurdsson might have been the discussion item that cost Koeman his job.