Personally my expectations are moulded by every ball I've seen kicked since 1960. I know what good players do, I know how good teams play and we're not doing it.
The Club /Team /Staff /Board (should) set the expectations, but there's no winners in this Club on or off the field that's why they are set to average and some days we struggle to do average...oh yes we have our high points and low points and they average out to...average
Supporters don't set them we just come along to watch the players and staff try to meet or exceed their own expectations.
any expectation we as supporters have should be based on if we think they will met or exceed theirs
I'd usually stop any of the people I manage after that reply and ask them to try again but answer the question, because you didn't.
Not trying to be argumentative, but to judge
Moyes and/or Martinez, you have to have a baseline level of expectations to do that. In football that could be easily quantified by where they need to finish in the league or how many trophies they should be winning. Less tangible might be quality of football on display. All I would like to know is what should Martinez (and
Moyes if you want to go down that route) be delivering in terms of a tangible output and why? For example you might say Martrinez should have us in the top 4 as your level of expectations, and if you do I'd like to know why he should be doing that. If you think top 6 is the minimum requirement, what basis do you use for that level of expectation?