I haven't missed your point, it's just rubbish. What difference would it have made to fans attitude if they'd been told 72 hours ahead of the game instead of 24? None. It's possibly the most nonsensical thing i've ever read on here, and that is not an easy accolade.
Ancelloti did say he wants to use some of youth players so I'd say that's a good shout . eggs was talking about him the other day .
2-0 Newcastle then. Who is their worst player? Brace for him.
For a start, I think everybody would be a lot more confident with Richarlison on the pitch. Having players you know you can trust helps with atmosphere, instead when we all thought we’d have our best player back for a winnable home game he will now be replaced by someone nowhere near as good.
Shelvey available? Just the sort of player to score a goal-of-the-season winner again us, him.
Mate stop mouth breathing and just think about what you're saying for a second. It wouldn't matter when they told us he wasn't playing would it, he still wouldn't be playing. So we still wouldn't have a player we trust in the team, so the atmosphere would not be changed one iota. When we found about the change would not matter in the situation you're talking about, you're just being weird for the sake of it.
Of course it matters when they tell us. We all started the day thinking we'd have our best player back, confident of going in to beat a poor Newcastle team at home. Now we're all on a downer thinking that we'll be replicating the turgid West Ham performance.
Don't see what your issue is.
