I enjoy listening to Tommy Robinson. Whether you agree with his opinion or not, he is confident, brave and knowledgeable, and usually backs up his opinions with some kind of evidence, facts etc.
I'd argue that his opinions are more balanced than the opinions of those who refuse to engage with him.
He encourages and welcomes others to debate and engage with him. Many choose not too. He is often drowned out and responded to with cries of 'racist, fascist' etc. I have respect for him for being willing to discuss and debate his opinions. I have less respect for those who stick their fingers in their ears, insult him, abuse him and refuse to answer. For many, it's easier to call him racist and end the conversation there, than be willing to debate with him.
That said, he was part of the EDL....that's his biggest problem and it has not done him any favours. The typical EDL member is a knuckle-dragger of the highest order. But, your average knuckle-dragger is not given the opportunity to debate their opinions on TV.
There are many interviews on TV / internet featuring Tommy Robinson. The BBC have welcomed him onto radio shows, The Big One on BBC Sunday Mornings. Even the Oxford Student Union gave him a one hour platform to speak and applauded him off at the end. Did they all agree with him? Probably not, but he was given a fair opportunity to make his point. What is fairer than that?