Are you saying we should stadium share Mr city?
Are you saying we should stadium share Mr city?
You did not read that at all.
Maybe I just read it wrong brother. Or skim read it as it is a tad long.
So what you're saying is that you're against shared stadium thing?
North London is not as affluent as you think - it is quite poor in parts. The Wirral is affluent, one of the most affluent parts of the UK, and 1/3 of EFCs season ticket holders live there. North of Liverpool, Formby. Southport are very affluent areas. Not all of Gtr Liverpool is like Anfield.
inner city said:Man U are the second richest club in the world and in Manchester, which is no different to Liverpool. Liverpool FC a have long season ticket list. LFC are holding back to get the 73,000 seater.
Yep. The two clubs can benefit greatly by both on a recommissioned rapid-transit line.
This misses two important points. For a start, whilst parts of North London are quite "poor" (and of course with London, the poor parts and rich parts are usually in very close proximity to one another), the parts around Ashburton are not - the average price for a one bedroom flat is £269,000, for a four bedroom its £760,000. Secondly, Arsenal do not solely attract fans from that area - they have a wide following and a lot of very rich City types follow them, which is why the 10,000 richest seats and boxes (which went in 06/07 for between £2500 and £65000 a season) contribute as much money as the old Highbury did. There is nowhere in the North West that has that many rich people willing to go to the football, even at Old Trafford.
But all United did is have a successful team, which meant that they could milk a lot of non-attending gloryhunting fans of cash, and stayed at a stadium which they owned and which they could then afford to (relatively cheaply) expand. We need to consider doing the same.
This misses two important points. For a start, whilst parts of North London are quite "poor" (and of course with London, the poor parts and rich parts are usually in very close proximity to one another), the parts around Ashburton are not - the average price for a one bedroom flat is £269,000, for a four bedroom its £760,000. Secondly, Arsenal do not solely attract fans from that area - they have a wide following and a lot of very rich City types follow them, which is why the 10,000 richest seats and boxes (which went in 06/07 for between £2500 and £65000 a season) contribute as much money as the old Highbury did. There is nowhere in the North West that has that many rich people willing to go to the football, even at Old Trafford.
Can we build it in a way so we benefit and they don't?
I disagree with your comments re: OT. The rest I do not disagree with you. I am emphasizing that Gtr Liverpool does have wealthy areas and wealthy people - and quite a few of them as well.
Man U are unique.They get amazing following initially because of Munich 1958 and the subsequent success.
Man U also expanded into lots of space which ended up being a trendy area - Salford Quays. By no stretch of the imagination can Walton be equated to Man Us location and situation. They even have their own rail station at the side of the stand. All surveys and studies have indicated that EFC move as the site is just plain bad.
Couldn't agree more- the Arse peeps pay because it fits in with their lifestyle.
What would you invisage, mate as an ideal Everton stadium mate in terms of capaicty etc and how much do you think would be safe to compleate and borrow.
I know there are comparrisons with the Emiretes etc, equally we have our own uniuqe prob and i think London is a factor.
You missed it. The secret of Arsenal's success was the rapid-transit serving the large stadium, and they want to go to 70,000, not fickle City types.
There is enough fans with the money around Gtr Liverpool and beyond to fill a large stadium - if they can get there easy and in comfort.
Generalizations that Liverpool is destitute and London is rolling in it is totally untrue and unreflective.