Phil Schofield.

Status
Not open for further replies.
He’s a tory loving labour hating rat. Don’t care about his sexuality, he’s an absolute unfunny pig.
I don't like him because of those abhorrent adverts for WeBuyAnyCar.com.

I know that he doesn't write them but it really annoys me that they suggest that you should not worry about getting the best price you can for your car. For many people it is the most expensive thing they buy after their homes. £300/400 means a lot to many people.
 
I have a friend of many years who got married in secret because it was to a man. He is what you'd have traditionally called or thought of as a 'man's man'.

Understandably, he had grew up in a period where it was probably incredibly difficult to come out, and perhaps he didn't want the stigma. Maybe we'd alienate him?

Yet when he told us, not one of us was bothered and we all said we had knew for a long, long time. In fact, we were more upset that we weren't invited to the day.

I would have loved to have gone and celebrated with him on his special day because he's a mate and he's happy: that's the only thing that should really matter.

If people have an issue with a person's sexuality or judge people based on it, they need to go and give their head a wobble! Honestly, they can k'off!

Back to Scofield though, my only issue is that this has actually made the news. I'm happy for him, but isn't making a huge fuss in the end counter productive?

He's gay, so what? It shouldn't matter at all. In the short term, it may make it easier for others to do the same, but it's sensationalising what should be a norm.
There was one guy in my office who, when my mate came out, whispered to me (as if I would agree) I don't mind them but don't want to sit opposite one. He wasn't even joking. Really never understood that kinda reaction. Pretty evil
 
I have a friend of many years who got married in secret because it was to a man. He is what you'd have traditionally called or thought of as a 'man's man'.

Understandably, he had grew up in a period where it was probably incredibly difficult to come out, and perhaps he didn't want the stigma. Maybe we'd alienate him?

Yet when he told us, not one of us was bothered and we all said we had knew for a long, long time. In fact, we were more upset that we weren't invited to the day.

I would have loved to have gone and celebrated with him on his special day because he's a mate and he's happy: that's the only thing that should really matter.

If people have an issue with a person's sexuality or judge people based on it, they need to go and give their head a wobble! Honestly, they can k'off!

Back to Scofield though, my only issue is that this has actually made the news. I'm happy for him, but isn't making a huge fuss in the end counter productive?

He's gay, so what? It shouldn't matter at all. In the short term, it may make it easier for others to do the same, but it's sensationalising what should be a norm.



I agreed with the sentiment of this point for a long, long time, but I'm starting to come around to the idea that we can't really comprehend what it's like for someone who lives in the public eye. It's different circumstances, and homosexuality has a variety of exceptional consequences and considerations for those leading public lives. If he felt he wasn't being honest and carrying around a massive secret for 20+ years, he might well have felt that a public proclamation was the only way to express his truth adequately
 
Last edited:
There was one guy in my office who, when my mate came out, whispered to me (as if I would agree) I don't mind them but don't want to sit opposite one. He wasn't even joking. Really never understood that kinda reaction. Pretty evil
It's narrow minded bigotry based on their own insecurities and preconceptions. My mantra is simple: I'm not who you sleep with, live with, your religion or colour.

I judge people quite simply on one criteria: are you a decent person or are you a tit? Someone being gay, their accent, having white skin or whatever is irrelevant.

The only exception is if you're a Liverpool fan, and they are all tits!
 
Fairly obvious he was much like Clif Richard or a fella I used to work with.

It's times like this that we could finally dispel the illusion of being gay and will choose to speculate instead.

Instead of running it as a massive story, a small footnote instead would tell anyone who is in the closet that it's not really a big deal to announce you are. Or in fact not feel the need to announce anything. Because if I don't have to announce I am straight, noone now days should have to feel like they need to tell others they are gay.

After all, doesn't change anything about Schofield at all , so why make it a big deal?
 
He's watched that Barrymore documentary last night with his wife on the sofa and realised he's missing out on life and needs to start having some pool parties pronto.
 
He’s not even remotely interesting even with this apparently amazing revelation.

bet he’s been goosing around behind his wife’s back though the dirty rotter. Let’s see him come clean about that(n)
 
I agreed with the sentiment of this point for a long, long time, but I'm starting to come around to the idea that we can't really comprehend what it's like for someone who lives in the public eye. It's different circumstances, and homosexuality has a variety of exceptional consequences and considerations for those leading public lives. If he felt he wasn't being honest and carrying around a massive secret for 20+ years, he might well have felt that a public proclamation was the only way to express his truth adequately
Sorry, perhaps I didn't make my point clear enough.

I have no issue at all with him making a public declaration; it must have been such a difficult thing to come out and say, especially as he's a public figure.

My issue is with the likes of Sky and the BBC (any news outlet really) running it as a news story on TV, radio and on-line. I simply don't understand the reason.
 
I simply don't understand the reason.

Because people want to hear about it.

In many ways, he's turned it into a spectacle. Which is why there has been a great deal of cynicism about the manner and timing of the 'announcement'.

I agree with the sentiment though, if you're gay then it's nobody's business but your own. You shouldn't have to hide it, nor should you have to proclaim it. If you want to do either of those, that's fine. It's your prerogative entirely.

My own opinion of it is that he's deliberately timed and sensationalised this to escape the negative press he's been getting for his behaviour. And it's worked. He's immune to criticism now, for a bit.

He alluded to the fact that Holly had known about it for some time, that his management at ITV had known about it for some time.

To me it's about as staged and insincere as it possibly could have been. My greatest sympathies are reserved for his wife and kids, but it seems fairly amicable from what he's said
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top