I think what City would lose in defensive recovery they would gain in control of possession with that move, unfortunately as they are bad for the game imoKyle Walker to Bayern
I think what City would lose in defensive recovery they would gain in control of possession with that move, unfortunately as they are bad for the game imoKyle Walker to Bayern
I'm a big Arteta fan, but can't get my head around the potential signing of Havertz, he's an absolute nothing player
I rated Odengarrd as a better player than Havertz. I think for that kind of dough you have to be improving your starting line up, havertz doesn't improve that front 4.He did some job with Odengarrd mate.
I rated Odengarrd as a better player than Havertz. I think for that kind of dough you have to be improving your starting line up, havertz doesn't improve that front 4.
I think Arsenal are a bit more incisive in their play than City, a bit more entertaining too though obviously less effective. Unless Havertz played instead of Odengarrd I think they lose too much in pace and power with him coming in. He's a pretty player that lacks too many tools imo.Could be mate. When i saw the link thats what i thought, two lads with a similar profile, who were very highly rated at a young age, got two big moves, didn't quite work out. I know they are sperate humans like.
But be curious could Arteta get more out of him, he was hugely rated before he went to Chelsea.
Arteta seems to do the Pep thing and wants to build a library of attacking midfielders.
I think Arsenal are a bit more incisive in their play than City, a bit more entertaining too though obviously less effective. Unless Havertz played instead of Odengarrd I think they lose too much in pace and power with him coming in. He's a pretty player that lacks too many tools imo.
I think they tried to combat that defensive block with zinchenko creating the modfield overload, zinchenko looked more tired than most by the end mind.Think the difference for me was Arsenal lacked the depth City had last season mate. They were goosed come April, someone like Havrtez can come in and forgive in 4-5 different positions. The space they create as well he can float in and out of - thats his A game.
Arsenal were definitely more incisive having have pacy and direct players, the difficulty they will have next season though is that teams will start to set up to be not to be broken down more the way they do against City, think it was starting to happen more and more as the season went on. Many wouldn't have tipped Arsenal for second last year.
They consistently invest as well, steady every year - rive and maybe Havertz this year - its all self sufficient as well - would love us to have a similar business plan to them.
I think they tried to combat that defensive block with zinchenko creating the modfield overload, zinchenko looked more tired than most by the end mind.
I agree entirely on them losing tge league on depth, just unconvinced Havertz is the solution.
If aging didn't matter, I would still bury my kid in a sprint. He clocked a few hundredths of a second faster than me in a race years ago prior to hitting puberty, anyway.Not really, if he's no slower at 33 than 23 he's not suddenly going to turn into Keane for the last 2-3 years of his career is he. I know you magically believe everyone turns 30 wakes up and can't run anymore though.
If aging didn't matter, I would still bury my kid in a sprint. He clocked a few hundredths of a second faster than me in a race years ago prior to hitting puberty, anyway.
Sooner or later, the cliff arrives. It's just hard to predict exactly when, from player to player.
There's something weird going on with the money around the top of the league - like an unspoken agreement that see cashflow just washing around the 'big clubs'I'm a big Arteta fan, but can't get my head around the potential signing of Havertz, he's an absolute nothing player
The devil is in the details. A one-year is a no brainer. That's why Chelsea kept re-upping Silva.But he hasn't hit his cliff yet so why wouldn't you sign him. He's a 1-2 year investment for a really good right-back.
The devil is in the details. A one-year is a no brainer. That's why Chelsea kept re-upping Silva.
As you add years to the deal, it becomes riskier. His agent knows this, and will try to extract as many years as possible from a club.
Fair. There are many worse moves for them. It's a club where, if it goes sour, they can afford to fix it. They can roll the bones.I honestly just couldn't care less at this point. My original and only point: it's not a bad transfer for Bayern.