New Kits 2023/24

[chrismpw]

Terrible.

Quite like it if I'm honest. Nice texture in the green. Terrible sponsor though.

 

[Papa Shango]

Terrible.

That probably looks a little better with short sleeves. Most long sleeves shirts where there is a pattern on the sleeve look a bit wrong.

Still pretty ugly though. The black doesnt work on it either.

 

[Alan Whittle]

View attachment 215820

My grandson loves it even more because of this!

 

[Alan Whittle]

That new Celtic kit is just wrong.

I am generally a grumpy, moaning old git but kits generally are getting worse. Much worse. AMIRIGHT?

 

[McBain]

 

[TheBigIguana]

The different color shoulders doesn't work

 

[EuroTexan]

That probably looks a little better with short sleeves. Most long sleeves shirts where there is a pattern on the sleeve look a bit wrong.

Still pretty ugly though. The black doesnt work on it either.

I'd guess its going to depend on seeing it on a player rather than just looking at pics like this. That said, the magners logo on the back is probably going to condemn it to awful status for me. I can accept the main sponsor logo on the front of shirts ok, but having a different one on the back too is just a step too far for me. Whats next? Another sponsor deal on the shorts, and another on the socks? Nah.. shoot that into the sun. Having a different sponsor on the shirt sleeves instead like in the PL is an a barely acceptable compromise to me. This crosses the line.

 

[marsh]

Boss that

 

[Walken]

Quite like it if I'm honest. Nice texture in the green. Terrible sponsor though.

I like it, the inclusion of the black 3 stripe is interesting.

 

[Walken]

That new Celtic kit is just wrong.

I am generally a grumpy, moaning old git but kits generally are getting worse. Much worse. AMIRIGHT?

I think its over saturation, hard to develop an affinity for a kit that is on the for sale racks 6 months after it was released.

Not a big surprise that retro style kits seem to be the most loved as people already have some form of attachment to them.

 

[Nymzee]

Terrible.

Gross that. What’s wrong with just plain green.

 

[Preki]

Terrible.

Awful

 

[NathDogg]

Belter this.

 

[Papa Shango]

I'd guess its going to depend on seeing it on a player rather than just looking at pics like this. That said, the magners logo on the back is probably going to condemn it to awful status for me. I can accept the main sponsor logo on the front of shirts ok, but having a different one on the back too is just a step too far for me. Whats next? Another sponsor deal on the shorts, and another on the socks? Nah.. shoot that into the sun. Having a different sponsor on the shirt sleeves instead like in the PL is an a barely acceptable compromise to me. This crosses the line.

The French league already do this. Some clubs have a ludicrous amount of sponsors on their shirts. I think its the same in the likes of Austria too.

I suppose this is what happens when money dominates a sport.

 

[ClausThomsen]

The different color shoulders doesn't work

I think it works really well. Nice contrast picking out the red in the badge if I'm gonna get all floral about it.