Transfer Rumour Nathan Ake

It's because:

A. He plays in a position that we are already well stocked in, whilst other positions have been neglected for decades.

B. He's crocked.

C. He's very expensive.
I think we saw at the weekend we are not as well stocked as we think.
In any event I think the link with Ake has been discredited now.
I honestly would be surprised if City let such a talented and versatile player leave... which imo is a pity for us.

I don't have a clue what he earns every week but I think that in the current world of Premiership footballers if we want good players we have to pay big wages.
 



You seem stuck in the past when it comes to how the game is played.

Arteta's Arsenal often start with four central defenders. When Pep's City was at their best, they often played four central defenders. Thomas Frank in Brentford often played a central defender as right back to get the best out of Mbeumo.

Moyes was clear the other day that right back wasn't his priority. While fans seems to disagree, he seems to see O'Brien as a right back. He doesn't seem to trust him as central defender. Dyche didn't trust him. There's this weird idea amongst many that because he looks better than expected as a right back, he must be great as a central defender. Ignoring the fact that he always has looked better as a right back than as a central defender for Everton.

It will come down to balance. If we sign this young, progressive right back that everyone seems to want, he is likely to look awful playing behind a Dibling or a Fofana. We will need a rock solid defense that is defense first to get the best out of our offensive players.

Best example was the first half against Leeds. Almost everything came down our left side and both Garner and Ndiaye struggled against Bogle and James. Moyes asked Ndiaye and Alcaraz to swap sides to give Garner some more help. Only to see Leeds start attacking down our right side. Leeds game plan was to exploit that Ndiaye is limited defensively and neutralize his offensive output by forcing him into defending.

In a perfect world we all want offensive full backs bombing down the line and combining with offensive flare players, but can you do that with a team that averages less than 40% possession in matches?

Could it be worthwhile playing four central defenders in certain matches if it allows Ndiaye, Grealish and Dibling(?) to cheat on the defensive work and stay a little higher? Just so we have someone to aim for when we win the ball.

Also remember that Branthwaite once was seen as right footed. He mostly uses his left foot because of his position, but I am sure he'll be fine as a right CD. Ake and Branthwaite can easily play together. Tarkowski on current form and the first two months of last season should not be a starter.

Yeah, I think it was Tony Pulis that instigated the worldwide phenomenon of having four centre backs in defence. But even if Moyes does have some demented desire to implement the Tony Pulis guide to football, it’s still really bloody stupid to be spending money on acquiring a 5th centre back when you have no right winger whatsoever, and no right back worth talking about.

I’ve also already made my point about Doucoure. We have let him go because a one year extension on his wages was seen as too much, only to spend 28 million on KDH, and potentially spending an absolute fortune on a 5th centre back that is more crocked than Doucoure, and way more expensive than Doucoure.

It’s just yet more crap transfer trading strategy! We don’t need to intellectualise it into being something else, when it’s just Everton being Everton.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top