I'm still championing Vlasic and Lookman so I think that answers that.
Gordon has shown a bit more but honestly if Gordon went on a ten game run where he struggled would people still be patient with him? I doubt it.
I really only have two points here: 700 league minutes without any kind of consistency with when the minutes actually happen isn't really a realistic chance to prove yourself and even if you think it is talented young players need to be given more than one chance before being written off and sold. Hell I'd still give Tom Davies another shot if we could get him in a box to box role that isn't asking him to be an actual good defensive player.
Oh and I guess the last point is as supporters we need to come around to the idea of patient development of young players as the path to success.
Well neither Lookman nor vlasic have exactly ripped up any trees since they left have they?
But both of them showed more glimpses of quality for us than Kean has done since he’s been here IMO.
The Gordon point is a weird one because I think 100% people would still get behind him if he struggled for 10 games. People are still getting behind Davies after 100 bad games. And Gordon has already shown that he’s got a much better level of tactical discipline and footballing intelligence than Kean.
700 league minutes is not a lot. But it’s enough to show SOMETHING, and for me he hasn’t shown it yet.
I would start him in the last 3 games and see if he can offer anything else. Fingers crossed he proves me wrong