I think he's made some astute signings, most notably Digne, but I can't accept the idea that he's managed to take the squad in hand and steer it in the right direction.
He failed to nip the Pickford situation in the bud, and he's now basically a laughing stock who will be impossible to shift at anything but a massive loss.
The two senior centre-backs are extremely limited, with the one who Brands bought being significantly more of a liability than the other.
There are no back-ups that the manager is willing to use at full-back, which is tantamount to there being no back-up at all. This has also had a knock-on effect elsewhere, as players bought for 4-3-3 are now being overrun in a two-man midfield.
There's virtually no cover in attack because he wasted a significant amount of money on Kean, Bernard and Iwobi; none of whom have been regular starters under any of the managers they've played under.
If he recognises how unfit for purpose both Sigurdsson and Delph are, he failed to shift either in the summer.
To me, the same old problems that were obvious under Walsh are still in evidence now. As a chief scout, he's been hit and miss, which is fair enough (few, if any, get everything right), but as the man responsible for overseeing joined-up thinking and long-term strategising across the board, I don't think he's done well enough on most fronts.
I cant disagree with much, but the one thing I will say is its easy to say "failed to replace or get rid" when who is wanting to take our garbage mate? Look at Siggy, Delph as examples. They're not the worst players in the world, but what club is A. looking to take us from us? If you answer that question which is fine, you can then ask B. Are they paying their wages? The answer is no.
As you say, they get some right and some wrong which is fine (to an extent) but there has to be an overall plan and that's what I would criticise him for. I can't blame him for not being able to sell Sandro, Siggurdsson, JJK etc. I wouldn't buy them, why would a professional in the business want them?
The Pickford thing, well, there has been a decent GK in there previously so I can understand showing some faith (especially when recently there has been bigger needs in terms of positioning). However your right who's going to pay a good fee for him now? Again, Wages come into an issue. He seems to have absolutely fallen of a cliff edge in terms of ability, confidence and mentality. The witch hunt in the media hasn't helped him either or us.
Overall, we are still suffering from the Walsh regime, but I dont think Brands has helped himself in certain areas. We do have a backup right back in JJK (we by all accounts were looking for one and would have sold if we had got another), who has been injured at an unfortunate time as Coleman being injured, also Holgate being injured too. We also seemed to have a promising left back behind Digne (Niels played well in his games, young, promising, pacey, can whip a ball). I think that question of not playing him comes down to CA though as CA did say he'd rang him, spoke to him and convinced him to come too.
I'm sure Brands has made changes to recruitment and the academy (which you don't see until years down the line), but I have to agree some of it has been questionable. If i could see the plan, or the thinking behind it (Like I kinda saw with Delph, covers plenty of positions, experienced) then I could stay patient or hold off on the questions. There just appears to be no plan, or at least there was and that's been changed to appease Ancelotti, which again, I dont mind but at least have some consistency with it and a clear vision.